Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension

[Randall Gellens <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

At 2:13 AM +0300 11/13/98, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Other important issue. As Tim Showalter noticed setflags should be bind to
> fileinto, because multiple fileinto are possible for the same message. Any
> ideas? (Tim Showalter proposed to add additional parameter to fileinto, so I
> mean "any other ideas" here)

I think the simplest thing to do is to have setflags and fileinto be 
separate actions.  A setflags which is not followed by a fileinto sets 
flags for the message when it is filed into the default folder (inbox). 
A setflags followed by a discard means the setflags was for naught, but 
so what?

Alexey, how would you feel about pursuing setflags as an extension 
after the Sieve base spec is published?  As useful as I think setflags 
is, I think we need to focus on keeping Sieve simple and getting it out 
the door.