[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: mostly open issues

To: Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: mostly open issues
From: Steve Hole <steve@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 08:45:54 -0700
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxx

On Thu, 12 Nov 1998 22:05:54 -0800 (PST) Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

> My take, arrived at independently, is that Chris is reading DRUMS correctly.
> 
> In addition, we've found that generation of Resent-* fields isn't a good idea.

I'm inclined to agree with Ned.   Not because of his and Chris's reading of 
DRUMS, but because of the argument that the resent headers are generally not 
as useful as one would think.  The add complexity and potential ambiguity 
with little relevant benefit -- especially if a receiving UA is not supposed 
to use them for anything other than trace information. 

---  
Steve Hole                           
The Esys Corporation
Mailto:Steve.Hole@xxxxxxx  
Phone:403-424-4922

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mostly open issues
  - From: Randall Gellens

References:
- Re: mostly open issues
  - From: Ned Freed
- Re: mostly open issues
  - From: Tim Showalter

Prev by Date: Re: mostly open issues
Next by Date: RE: Proposed Sieve extensions
Previous by thread: Re: mostly open issues
Next by thread: Re: mostly open issues
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread