[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension

To: Matthew Wall <wall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension
From: Ned Freed <Ned.Freed@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 1998 19:10:34 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Randall Gellens <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexey Melnikov <mel@xxxxxxxxx>, Barry Leiba <leiba@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Fri, 13 Nov 1998 17:59:53 -0400" <>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxx


> --On Thu, Nov 12, 1998 5:11 PM -0800 the entity known as Randall Gellens
> <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> >
> > I wouldn't say abandon.  I think it is worth continuing work on in
> > parallel, but make it clear that it is an extension, both in the draft
> > and in mailing list discussions.

> fwiw, I agree...I personally find this a really useful extension, since it
> could be used by the client as well (we already have such a capability, for
> instance, it would be nice to make our filter match Sieve syntax) but it's
> not a base spec item.

I agree as well.

				Ned

Follow-Ups:
- Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

References:
- Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension
  - From: Randall Gellens
- Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension
  - From: Matthew Wall

Prev by Date: Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension
Next by Date: Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension
Previous by thread: Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension
Next by thread: Re: IMAPFLAGS SIEVE extension
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread