Re: List of expected changes for sieve 05 draft

[Matthew Wall <wall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

--On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 3:32 PM -0500 in response to Tony Hansen
<tony@xxxxxxx>: 

> 
> > > > > ...which also allows '["from", "rcpt"]' for more flexibility.
> 
> > > I'm writing this now and it occurs to me that it might be clearer if
> > > that's "from" and "to" instead of "from" and "rcpt".
> 
> > How about "mail-from" and "rcpt-to" to make them more consistent with
> > the smtp envelope verbs?

the entity known as Tim Showalter <tjs+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't see a lot of merit in making them similar to the SMTP verbs

well, except there is virtue in being consistent with _something_, and one
might make the point that the SMTP-savvy are going to be well-represented
among those looking at the syntax.

Still, I'd prefer 'from' and 'to' for simplicity's sake, even if it's
technically a bit less explicit. Why bother typing the extra chars, eh?

- matt <wall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>