Re: List of expected changes for sieve 05 draft

[Alexey Melnikov <mel@xxxxxxxxx>]

Matthew Wall wrote:

> --On Wed, Nov 18, 1998 3:32 PM -0500 in response to Tony Hansen
> <tony@xxxxxxx>:
>
> >
> > > > > > ...which also allows '["from", "rcpt"]' for more flexibility.
> >
> > > > I'm writing this now and it occurs to me that it might be clearer if
> > > > that's "from" and "to" instead of "from" and "rcpt".
> >
> > > How about "mail-from" and "rcpt-to" to make them more consistent with
> > > the smtp envelope verbs?
>
> the entity known as Tim Showalter <tjs+@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I don't see a lot of merit in making them similar to the SMTP verbs
>
> well, except there is virtue in being consistent with _something_, and one
> might make the point that the SMTP-savvy are going to be well-represented
> among those looking at the syntax.
>
> Still, I'd prefer 'from' and 'to' for simplicity's sake, even if it's
> technically a bit less explicit. Why bother typing the extra chars, eh?
>
> - matt <wall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Why not just use "f" and "t". They are even shorter :-)

--
Regards,
Alexey Melnikov
------------------------------------------
SMTP/POP3/IMAP4/ACAP servers creation team

Epsylon Technologies, Russia
 http://www.taxxi.com

Imap Development Kit (my own product)
http://194.87.43.111/homerus/mail/idk/index.htm

Fax (in San Diego, California): 1 (619) 8393837
------------------------------------------