Re: spamtest/virustest "NIL" behaviour

[Cyrus Daboo <daboo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Nigel,

--On Wednesday, April 30, 2003 1:28 PM +0100 Nigel Swinson 
<Nigel@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| When the virus scanner or the anti spam scanner fail, I presume we give
| the spamtest/virustest a "NIL" value as though it never even passed
| through the scanner.  So according to RFC2244, when we use ascii-numeric,
| that seems to imply that "NIL" turns into a very large number.  Is that
| right?

Yes - Ned pointed this out and I did fix the example and add some comments 
about this situation.

--
Cyrus Daboo