[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 'header' test and whitespace
> > for the base specification, I would like a tiny change to make this
>> a little more apparent:
> > For instance, the test `header :contains ["To", "Cc"]
> > - ["me@xxxxxxxxxxx", "me00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"]' is true if either the
> > + ["me@xxxxxxxxxxx", "me00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"]' is true if either a
> > To header or Cc header of the input message contains either of the
> > email addresses "me@xxxxxxxxxxx" or "me00@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx".
> Seems like a good idea to me.
I'm repeating it once more so Philip may take note of it :-).
also in the latest draft is this:
The preferred way to test whether a given header is either empty or
absent is to combine an "exists" test and a "header" test:
anyof (header :is "Cc" "", not exists "Cc")
this will evaluate to true for:
it may not be worth considering this rather degenerate case. it seems
to me Bcc is a more likely candidate for the stated test. however, one
way of stating the test correctly is:
not (header :matches "Cc" "?*")
it's not much more convoluted, so I think it is worthwhile to change the