[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 3028bis, section 4.2, paragraph 2
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:26:16PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> it would instead say:
> The message is send back out with the address from the redirect
> command as an envelope recipient. Implementations MAY combine
> separate redirects for a given message into a single submission with
> multiple envelope recipients. (This is not an MUA-style forward,
> which creates a new message with a different sender and message ID,
> wrapping the old message in a new one.)
> And yes, the elimination of the mention of .forward files in intentional,
> as that irked some.
> Are there any objections to the above change?
Only that you should replace "send" with "sent" ("The message is sent...").