Re: 3028bis, section 4.2, paragraph 2

["Mark E. Mallett" <mem@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:26:16PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:


> it would instead say:
> 
>    The message is send back out with the address from the redirect
>    command as an envelope recipient.  Implementations MAY combine
>    separate redirects for a given message into a single submission with
>    multiple envelope recipients.  (This is not an MUA-style forward,
>    which creates a new message with a different sender and message ID,
>    wrapping the old message in a new one.)
> 
> And yes, the elimination of the mention of .forward files in intentional, 
> as that irked some.

(yay!)


> Are there any objections to the above change?

Only that you should replace "send" with "sent" ("The message is sent...").
Otherwise fine.

mm