Re: Poll: consensus to change the encoded-character extension

["Mark E. Mallett" <mem@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 09:51:41PM +0200, Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 19:12 +0000, Aaron Stone wrote:
> > Note that LWSP is optional by definition,
> 
> ouch, good catch!

very.


> LWSP requires WSP after CRLF, too, so it's simply not what we want, we
> need to add another basic terminal, perhaps
> 
>    blank = WSP / CRLF
> 
> I suggest we stick to the poll question from Alexey, but with "1*blank"
> replacing LWSP in his suggested new text.

That looks right (name doesn't have to be "blank" but whatever).


> > I concur that comments should not be allowed.

ditto

mm