Re: Poll: consensus to change the encoded-character extension

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>]

Kjetil Torgrim Homme wrote:

> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 19:12 +0000, Aaron Stone wrote:
>  
>
> > Something like this:
> >
> >   encoded-character    = "${" encoded-char-scheme ":" encoded-char-seq
> > "}"
> >   encoded-char-scheme  = hex / unicode
> >   encoded-char-seq     = *(LWSP WSP 1*HEXDIG) LWSP
> >    
> if we allow ${hex:100} in the grammar, we need to say something in the
> text about the valid range.  I would prefer to stick to separate
> productions for encoded-arb-octets and encoded-unicode-char to keep the
> text simple and to minimise the change to the text.
>  
Speaking as a contributor: I agree.

> > Note that LWSP is optional by definition,
> >    
> ouch, good catch!
>  
Indeed.