Re: Naming conventions for Sieve RFCs

[Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ken Murchison wrote:

> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>
> > Philip Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007, Philip Guenther wrote:
> > >
> > > > For the drafts that's already in the RFC editor queue, I suspect 
> > > > this is best done by settling on the format, then Alexey swinging 
> > > > by the RFC editor table and asking them how they would like to get 
> > > > the request.
> > >
> > > Alexey and I chatted with the RFC editor and they said "yes, please 
> > > put all title updates in a single request and have your AD bless it".
> >
> > Have we settled on the format?
> > I just received a message from RFC editors saying that documents will 
> > go to AUTH48 shortly...
>
> Indeed.  If/when we decide on a format, am I supposed to send in the 
> title change(s) myself, or will the chairs do so?  I'm putting 
> together some other changes as we speak.

As nobody seems to be able to make a decision on this, chairs decided 
that all RFCs should use the following title:

Sieve Email Filtering: <Foo> Extension

I will send RFC editor messages for each affected RFC-to-be.