[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
Re: action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
To
:
ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
From
: Arnt Gulbrandsen <
arnt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 09:13:44 +0100
Cc
: Ned Freed <
ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx
>, =?koi8-r?b?5MnM0c4g8MHMwdXaz9c=?= <
Dilyan.Palauzov@xxxxxxxxx
>
In-reply-to
: <
01MRYB6E206U000RLZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
List-archive
: <
http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/
>
List-id
: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe
>
References
: <
FEBA698A54011EC81F4A1609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
21C5556C51FE0FCA0D6008C5@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
01MR7P2PA4FO00004Z@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
47B34E7B.2070300@xxxxxxxxx
> <
1203006439.25161.83.camel@oslhomkje
> <
47C99CFD.6010208@xxxxxxxxx
> <
01MRYB6E206U000RLZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Sender
:
owner-ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxxxxxxx
FWIW: My sieve interpreter does exactly what we're (not) allowing: I
fetch the sieve script as part of verifying that the rcpt to address
exists, and evaluate until some test fails for lack of data. I think
the draft as it stands is fine.
Arnt
Follow-Ups
:
Re: action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
From:
Ned Freed
References
:
Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-05.txt
From:
Cyrus Daboo
Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-05.txt
From:
Cyrus Daboo
Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-05.txt
From:
Ned Freed
action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
From:
=?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
Re: action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
From:
=?utf-8?b?0JTQuNC70Y/QvSDQn9Cw0LvQsNGD0LfQvtCy?=
Re: action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
From:
Ned Freed
Prev by Date:
Re: action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
Next by Date:
Re: action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
Previous by thread:
Re: action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
Next by thread:
Re: action reject and smtp RCPT TO:
Index(es):
Date
Thread