Re: [Fwd: Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-07.txt]

[Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 13:05 +0100, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Michael Haardt wrote:
> >The idea was to allow the system to used a fixed address, or a fixed
> >addressing scheme, no matter if the variable part is a RFC subadressing
> >detail or some other kind of subadressing, that can be recognised as such,
> >telling the mail "comes from the notification system".  The quoted part
> >tells exactly what was tried to express.  I would appreciate a better
> >wording, but can't think of any.
> 
> I think the following would be better:
> 
>  or to an email address associated with the notification system
> 
> This avoids the argument about whether there is a single addresse,
> whether it must be completely static, etc.

this is *exactly* what I was going to suggest myself :-)

-- 
best wishes,
Kjetil T.