[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments on draft-ietf-sieve-notify-mailto-07.txt
(Speaking as the document shepherd.)
Barry Leiba wrote:
I also have a more general question here:
How did this (actually, the -06 version) manage to get to the IESG,
and into IETF Last Call? I had no idea you were sending it yet, since
we'd talked about the -07 revision, and we clearly don't have WG
consensus on it.
Version -06 was accidentally sent to IETF LC, due to a wrong draft state
in the ID tracker. Oh well.
And things that I *did* think we had WG consensus are being revisited.
I didn't expect this either.
We need to pull it back from the IESG, (re)establish WG consensus (and
explain why the PROTO writeup was wrong), and then send it back for a
fresh IETF Last Call.
I am not entirely sure that we need another IETF LC, but let's make this
decision when the dust settles and the WG agrees on all changes.