Re: draft-ietf-sieve-refuse-reject-07.txt

[Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dave Cridland writes:
> I suspect that using a 2xx in this case might be best, since it would  
> become a "discard", in effect, if the LMTP client didn't understand  
> it, and the additional bandwidth and processing for LMTP connections  
> is negligable. For SMTP, a 4xx might be more sensible, which would  
> reduce the bandwidth, but not generate a DSN instantly.

200 2.7.1 Blah blah blah?

Arnt