[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Any objections to taking IMAP Sieve as a WG item?

To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Any objections to taking IMAP Sieve as a WG item?
From: Ned Freed <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:18:01 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: "Your message dated Wed, 13 Aug 2008 15:08:36 +0100" <48A2EAE4.1090306@xxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <48A2EAE4.1090306@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Sorry for forgetting to send this question earlier: do people have any
objections to working on draft-ietf-lemonade-imap-sieve-05.txt in the
updated Sieve WG?
It is currently a Lemonade WG document. Lemonade WG chairs have no
objections to Sieve WG taking this document.


I'd actually prefer to have this in the Sieve WG.

				Ned

References:
- Any objections to taking IMAP Sieve as a WG item?
  - From: Alexey Melnikov

Prev by Date: Any objections to taking IMAP Sieve as a WG item?
Previous by thread: Any objections to taking IMAP Sieve as a WG item?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread