[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?

To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
From: Robert Burrell Donkin <robertburrelldonkin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:29:00 +0100
Cc: ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y4Ht+IuDbRRV8/B9CFmg6jr0hr8/WnarmK5Qw+Bldrk=; b=hpxlLiCIbE0HYWRd6I8v6jaNaIR4K5l84X/UULniJfTqquYrpuIglz1tN29p0/nMdt vvLWd0KVhPhoBVb3jW8xCz1AEa75qv3lkdYiMuUKVDPr06NpDSzjn0siFBtBpy3ks0pG aN3lsoYzzzl+/qB7RJlHTqhbpLtVuBmHEPy94=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bIwCifv/xxywXdqVd2CmF1wBe/eowl/IE08Hd7k4JSy3Kpitwn7xFiP6SI8dDOOMfb +5s5unPQdY0PonQ7y0ZsZ6ipBFvVIz7VFAtxPraarNxHELlqeTlPkOF5JBYRLmGajAOK CJOdX0LfIUacd18uU4cEBDOTjErnr4ooMJ/5Y=
In-reply-to: <01N6XK80VI1600007A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mta-filters/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mta-filters.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mta-filters-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <f470f68e0812041225x318bfdccg1bf9201b53ce8c2e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <01N335CY3MAQ00SE3A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f470f68e0812150500r5d1916f4obbd941434295fe07@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <01N3MQQCAYL000007A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f470f68e0901061657g3aa2d63dwcdbee2ae91b3bbda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <01N41Q9BQSU800007A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f470f68e0901101020i7f12bce7j8d22748b596285a9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <01N465T9JTGS00007A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <f470f68e0901111357i3970cf89wf3f761c2ca06baf5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <01N6XK80VI1600007A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-mta-filters@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Ned Freed <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Robert, the question just came up in our meeting as to whether or not your
> various comments have been addressed to your satisfaction in the latest
> revision. I believe I have at least responded to them all, but I'd appreciate
> it if you could review and see what you think.

i was satisfied by your responses on list

- robert

Follow-Ups:
- Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Ned Freed

References:
- draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Robert Burrell Donkin
- Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Ned Freed
- Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Robert Burrell Donkin
- Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Ned Freed
- Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Robert Burrell Donkin
- Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Ned Freed
- Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Robert Burrell Donkin
- Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Ned Freed
- Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Robert Burrell Donkin
- draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
  - From: Ned Freed

Prev by Date: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
Next by Date: Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
Previous by thread: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
Next by thread: Re: draft-freed-sieve-in-xml status?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread