Re: LMAP Validation Analysis

["Hector Santos" <hsantos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I forgot to add that I would like comments and input, review of the tables,
missing conditions, flaw logic, explanations, etc.   It is a draft document
and hopefully, in the end, if deemed useful,  it can be used by new LMAP
implementators to understand better the envelope entities relationships.

Thanks

-- 
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Hector Santos" <hsantos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "Alan DeKok" <aland@xxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 10:41 PM
Subject: LMAP Validation Analysis


>
> Alan,
>
> I did this analysis awhile back when I first started to add some of the
> various LMAP-based proposals in our smtp server.  I just finished up the
> document.  I think it may help show how LMAP and dynamic vs. post RCPT
> validations plays a key role in LMAP results and usage.
>
> "The Association of the Sender IP and SMTP Envelope Domains:
> LMAP Validation and Trust Analysis"
>
> http://www.winserver.com/public/antispam/lmap/draft-lmapanalysis1.htm
>
> -- 
> Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
> http://www.santronics.com
>
>
>
>