RE: Accreditation NON-Proposal

["Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I believe it's high time for assuming "negative 
> accreditation" and asking questions later.  

At this point internet email appears to be about 80% spam.
I get about 1000 spam a day and about 200 legit emails
of which perhaps 40 are sent directly to me rather than
via mailing lists.

The meaning I am attempting to attach to accreditation
is that it is a statement provided by a third party. 

But I would ceetainly accept that we need to change the
equation, assume all email guilty until proven innocent.


		Phill