[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It

To: "Gordon Fecyk" <gordonf@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
From: Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 10:11:31 -0400
Cc: "IETF MXCOMP (E-mail)" <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Aug 24, 2004, at 8:52 PM, Gordon Fecyk wrote:

They're never going to appease the FSF high priests so they aren't wasting their time with them, instead focusing on the less fanatical majority of APL, MPL, BSD etc and their lesser priests.

Gordon,

I understand that many people are frustrated by both these discussions and having to have these discussions. Nonetheless, we must act with civility toward all parties. The FSF and GPL proponents should not be given such demeaning labels.

Please do not do it again.

-andy

References:
- DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: Gordon Fecyk

Prev by Date: Re: DEPLOY: Microsoft Royalty Free Sender ID Patent License FAQ
Next by Date: RE: TECH OMISSION: Stronger checks against email forgery
Previous by thread: Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread