[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It

To: Chuck Mead <csm@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
From: Daniel Quinlan <quinlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 25 Aug 2004 18:02:45 -0700
Cc: ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Chuck Mead's message of "Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:28:02 -0400"
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Chuck Mead <csm@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The list of MTA's which appear to be affected by this situation is not
> that long (sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim for sure) but I'd bet a

It's not just MTAs that will be implementing Sender-ID (or whatever),
but also mail filters (SpamAssassin 3.0 will support SPFv1) and perhaps
even MUAs.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/

References:
- DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: Gordon Fecyk
- Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: wayne
- Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: Ryan Ordway
- Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: Koen Martens
- Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: Ted Hardie
- Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: Chuck Mead

Prev by Date: Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements - licese terms are a blow to IETF process
Next by Date: Re: DEPLOY: Microsoft Royalty Free Sender ID Patent License FAQ
Previous by thread: Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
Next by thread: Re: [marid] Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread