[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [marid] Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It

To: IETF MARID WG <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [marid] Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
From: Benjamin Damm <bdamm-ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:49:43 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: IETF MARID WG <ietf-mxcomp@imc.org>
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6i

On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:35:41AM -0700, Ryan Ordway wrote:
> 	Perhaps a show of hands is in order to see just
> how much of a "minority" those who disapprove of the terms
> of the RFSIPL are? Consider my hand raised.
> 

I've been lurking for more than a month; now is the time to speak up.
The terms of the RFSIPL will restrict Sender-ID development.

My hand is raised.

-Benjamin

References:
- DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: Gordon Fecyk
- Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: wayne
- Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
  - From: Ryan Ordway

Prev by Date: Re: DEPLOY: Microsoft Royalty Free Sender ID Patent License FAQ
Previous by thread: Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
Next by thread: Re: DEPLOY/IPR: Fundamental Disagreements, or Get On With It
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread