[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DEPLOY - reference implementation

To: Mark <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DEPLOY - reference implementation
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 16:33:41 +0200
Cc: IETF MARID WG <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: NIC France
References: <> <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i

On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:00:02PM +0000,
 Mark <admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 96 lines which said:

> > The first step is very simple, I attached my own implementation. Bug
> > reports are welcome to show me where I've misread -pra.
> 
> Just for the heck of it, here is my Perl implementation of PRA. :)

Does anyone have a good corpus of "bordeline" mails to test the two
implementations? (Although the algorithm is very simple, so we should
not expect discrepancies.)

References:
- DEPLOY - reference implementation
  - From: Nate Leon
- Re: DEPLOY - reference implementation
  - From: Chuck Mead
- Re: DEPLOY - reference implementation
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: DEPLOY - reference implementation
  - From: Mark

Prev by Date: Re: DEPLOY: Microsoft Royalty Free Sender ID Patent License FAQ
Previous by thread: Re: DEPLOY - reference implementation
Next by thread: Re: DEPLOY - reference implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread