[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: acceptable licenses (Was: Can there be an early decision on the SenderID license?)

To: "IETF MARID WG" <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: acceptable licenses (Was: Can there be an early decision on the SenderID license?)
From: Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:13:46 -0400
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Aug 26, 2004, at 8:54 AM, wayne wrote:

Instead of addressing this issue, PHB has tried to reframe the
discussion.

If you are admonishing Phil, your energy is misplaced. It is not your place to decide the schedules of this working group nor how consensus is arrived at in this working group.

-andy

References:
- RE: Can there be an early decision on the SenderID license?
  - From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- acceptable licenses (Was: Can there be an early decision on the SenderID license?)
  - From: wayne

Prev by Date: DEPLOY: IPR/GPL
Next by Date: Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe)
Previous by thread: Re: acceptable licenses (Was: Can there be an early decision on the SenderID license?)
Next by thread: RE: Can there be an early decision on the SenderID license?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread