[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe)

To: Jim Fenton <fenton@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe)
From: Rand Wacker <rand@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:19:08 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Jim Fenton wrote:

> Of course, a new record type would be preferable, but there are
> real-world deployment issues there.

It is a good point of encouragement.

-Rand

References:
- Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe)
  - From: Jim Fenton

Prev by Date: Re: acceptable licenses (Was: Can there be an early decision on the SenderID license?)
Next by Date: Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe)
Previous by thread: Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe)
Next by thread: Re: DEPLOY: Over-running TXT dataspace in FQDN (-protocol I believe)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread