[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID

To: IETF MARID WG <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID
From: "Jeremy T. Bouse" <jeremy+spf@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:13:22 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: IETF MARID WG <ietf-mxcomp@imc.org>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i

	I would concur with this motion as well. I see no further point
in trying to continue with Sender-ID with it's licensing issue which
make it unusable with GPL or other OSS licenses. I think SPF classic can
be adopted and if needed modified to meet the goals of MARID without the
inclusion of Sender-ID.

	Regards,
	Jeremy

References:
- Motion to abandon Sender ID
  - From: Jonathan Gardner

Prev by Date: TECH-OMISSION:Submitter concept should be expanded to include Peristent User Accounts (PUA)
Next by Date: RE: Another Rambus, Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID
Previous by thread: Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID
Next by thread: Re: Motion to abandon Sender ID
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread