[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TECH-ERROR/DOC-BUG: empty fields in -pra

To: Roy Badami <roy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TECH-ERROR/DOC-BUG: empty fields in -pra
From: Tony Finch <dot@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:09:31 +0100
Cc: ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Roy Badami wrote:
>
> empty field bodies are illegal, and I don't believe they are prevelent
> in the wild.

I'm afraid they are common enough that strict syntax checking has a high
false positive rate.

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
LYME REGIS TO LANDS END INCLUDING THE ISLES OF SCILLY: WEST OR SOUTHWEST 2 TO
4. MAINLY FAIR, SMALL RISK FOG PATCHES. MODERATE WITH FOG PATCHES. SLIGHT TO
MODERATE.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TECH-ERROR/DOC-BUG: empty fields in -pra
  - From: Roy Badami

References:
- TECH-ERROR/DOC-BUG: empty fields in -pra
  - From: Roy Badami

Prev by Date: Re: PRA Patent: License for Display in MUAs?
Next by Date: RE: (DEPLOY) In Support of Sender ID
Previous by thread: Re: TECH-ERROR/DOC-BUG: empty fields in -pra
Next by thread: Re: TECH-ERROR/DOC-BUG: empty fields in -pra
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread