[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: If not Sender I.D., then what? (Was Re: In support of Sender ID)

To: "Anne P. Mitchell, Esq." <amitchell@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: If not Sender I.D., then what? (Was Re: In support of Sender ID)
From: Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 17:41:18 -0400
Cc: IETF MARID WG <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sep 3, 2004, at 5:13 PM, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. wrote:

So I wonder whether this would be useful data.

At this point, what is most useful is the reason inhibiting deployment. And many people have been quite clear about that.

-andy

References:
- If not Sender I.D., then what? (Was Re: In support of Sender ID)
  - From: Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.

Prev by Date: Re: Obstacles between us and the finish line
Next by Date: Re: In support of Sender ID
Previous by thread: If not Sender I.D., then what? (Was Re: In support of Sender ID)
Next by thread: Extension of Sender ID working group last call
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread