[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record

To: IETF MARID WG <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
From: Mark Lentczner <markl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 12:34:47 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sep 4, 2004, at 10:46 AM, Roy Badami wrote:

I propose that the record simply be called SPF.

This has been proposed several times on this list before. Since I have seen only only dissent from the idea, assuming the chairs agree that there is general consensus on this, I'll make this change.

- Mark

Mark Lentczner
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/
markl@xxxxxxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
  - From: Mark Lentczner
- Re: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
  - From: Roy Badami

References:
- TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
  - From: Roy Badami

Prev by Date: Re: Extension of Sender ID working group last call
Next by Date: Re: consensus call of RR prefix
Previous by thread: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
Next by thread: Re: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread