[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record

To: IETF MARID WG <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
From: Mark Lentczner <markl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 21:25:32 -0700
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

This has been proposed several times on this list before. Since I have seen only only dissent from the idea, assuming the chairs agree that there is general consensus on this, I'll make this change.

Ach! Since I have seen only ** one ** dissent...

- Mark

References:
- TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
  - From: Roy Badami
- Re: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
  - From: Mark Lentczner

Prev by Date: Re: consensus call of RR prefix
Previous by thread: Re: TECH-ERROR: Name of SPF2 record
Next by thread: DOC-BUG: Terminology: Purported Responsible Address
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread