RE: TECH OMISSION: Stronger checks against email forgery

[Tony Finch <dot@xxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 27 Aug 2004, Jim Lyon wrote:
>
> I continue to disagree.  There are too many scenarios where the bounce
> address is uncorrelated with the MTA that's delivering a message; this
> means that any scheme that attempts to reject mail based on those two
> inputs (bounce address and IP addr of sending MTA) will have too many
> false rejections.

What makes the PRA different from the bounce address from this point of
view?

Tony.
-- 
f.a.n.finch  <dot@xxxxxxxx>  http://dotat.at/
FAIR ISLE: WESTERLY BACKING SOUTHERLY 3 OR 4, OCCASIONALLY 5 AT FIRST. FAIR.
GOOD.