Re: consensus call on MUST/SHOULD language for TXT records

[Ryan Ordway <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 2004-09-03 at 14:33, Andrew Newton wrote:

> Despite lack of agreement on the outcome, there is agreement on the 
> stated positions.  In the words of Olafur:
> 1) Specify everyone to be compliant at all times.
> 2) Specify clearly full complaint state and tolerate non-compliant 
> state during phase-in.

	My vote is for 1. I believe allowing non-compliance
is an invitation for non-compliance.

-- 
HELO, my name is root... you have SIGKILLed my father... prepare to vi!