[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope

To: IETF MARID WG <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope
From: Peter Koch <pk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 19:13:37 +0200
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 Sep 2004 09:37:18 EDT." <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx> wrote:

>     ver-scope   = "pra" / "mailfrom" / name

[...]

>   2) multiple records are allowed
>   3) a scope (e.g. "pra") can only appear in one record of one type for 
> validity purposes

does this mean the mail receiver queries for the RR(s) and selects from what
is there if that fits its own supported set of scopes or should at the time
of the DNS query the receiving MTA already have made its choice?

-Peter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope
  - From: Andrew Newton

References:
- consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope
  - From: Andrew Newton

Prev by Date: Re: DEPLOY: IPR [was Re: TECH: use fetchmail algorithm to select header address to verify]
Next by Date: Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope
Previous by thread: Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope
Next by thread: Re: consensus call on pra/mailfrom deployment and versioning/scope
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread