[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: by the numbers

To: Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: by the numbers
From: Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 12:45:58 -0400
Cc: "IETF MARID WG" <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <> <> <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sep 14, 2004, at 12:06 PM, Andrew Newton wrote:

We did look at every domain but we did sample a statistically significant number of them.

Correction: We did NOT look at every domain but we did sample a statistically significant number of them.

-andy

References:
- Re: co-chair judgment of consensus related to last call period of 23-Aug-2004 to 10-Sept-2004
  - From: Peter Koch
- Re: co-chair judgment of consensus related to last call period of 23-Aug-2004 to 10-Sept-2004
  - From: wayne
- by the numbers
  - From: Andrew Newton

Prev by Date: Re: the TCP argument again, consensus call of RR prefix
Next by Date: Re: Interpreting "v=spf1" (was Work plan for Sender ID)
Previous by thread: by the numbers
Next by thread: Re: by the numbers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread