Re: Status of MARID WG?

To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Status of MARID WG?
From: Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:09:32 -0500
Cc: "'Dean Anderson'" <dean@xxxxxxx>, "'Harry Katz'" <hkatz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'ThomasGal@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <ThomasGal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'IETF MARID WG'" <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

On Nov 23, 2004, at 12:59 PM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

That has been the cry of the COBOL lobby, the FORTRAN lobby and every group that has promoted an obsolete legacy product as the future.

COBOL failed because RPG-III was superior!

-andy

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature