Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

[Andrew Newton <andy@xxxxxx>]

On Aug 25, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Bill Sommerfeld wrote:

> In this case, the two experiments interpret the same codepoints in the
> DNS in subtly different ways.
>
> A mail-sending domain indicates that it is participating by publishing
> certain DNS RR's.
> Crucially, a mail-sending domain cannot opt in to the SPF experiment
> without also opting in to the senderid experiment.  This renders any
> claimed results of either experiment suspect.

If this is the source of the conflict, then BOTH experiments should  
not use the v=spf1 records.

-andy