[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication

To: ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
From: Greg Hewgill <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2006 20:41:44 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=greg; d=hewgill.com; q=dns; c=simple; b=sCuPufH4JGV4DA36bZzpw4gwx3jmLzri+1nzHQ/Ijq2M0z1eT2XVKsKXzDU+Ba/pD0L23 l4zx/FJ5uZ3803+MEdanqLVklygNziSYWEW2S6Ump3GrftFhW+ip8iY6LeC9UB3Y3+VJgfTW hLehQoJcOUXLIRenyGZHqgKriGHI5w=
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0611061413150.10006-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
References: <CA634898-FCE8-4787-B860-669C685272D0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.44.0611061413150.10006-100000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 02:34:29PM -0500, Dean Anderson wrote:
> Most of this isn't commercial, either. Commercial bulk email is no
> longer a problem.

Is that right? Virtually all the spam I see relates to pharmacy, stock,
mortgage, pirated software, or are email worms. The whole idea of each
of those are to make money for somebody. I don't even know what
"non-commercial spam" would look like today.

Greg Hewgill
http://hewgill.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: Dean Anderson
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: wayne

References:
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: Dean Anderson

Prev by Date: Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
Next by Date: Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
Previous by thread: Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
Next by thread: Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread