Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication

[Scott Kitterman <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wednesday 08 November 2006 14:36, Douglas Otis wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:15:29 -0800 Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-
> >
> > abuse.org> wrote:
> >>> When you say the word script, do you mean SPF records (Please,
> >>> this is meant to be a yes/no question, there's no need to write a
> >>> dissertation that repeats the arguements made earlier in the
> >>> thread.  I read those already.)?
> >>
> >> The concern is with libraries that execute scripts labeled as SPF
> >> 1 or 2 contained within DNS resource records.  A potential attack
> >> utilizing just the access of these resources records has not been
> >> described.
> >
> > Is that a Yes?
>
> This has been succinctly answered.  Record is _not_ synonymous with
> script.
>
OK, then I guess that's no.

Record != Script.  I see from the above that in your view libraries execute 
scripts, so SPF checking library != Script.  I'm not sure what is left.  

Rather that rehash your 'succinct' answer, please point me to the page and 
line number(s) of your draft that either is a script or describes what it is 
and I'll look it up there.

Scott K