[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Interesting (ab)uses of DNS (was: Trouble with Sender Authentication)

To: ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Interesting (ab)uses of DNS (was: Trouble with Sender Authentication)
From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 15:00:34 +0100
List-archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/mail-archive/>
List-id: <ietf-mxcomp.imc.org>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-mxcomp-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>
Organization: <URL:http://purl.net/xyzzy>
References: <20061108181038.A6A165CC01E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <24200D2D-5669-47F0-9BCD-6F0CE88877EC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200611082330.47971.scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2DADCC01-CB88-4168-8621-1997BBDA1B75@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0611091239520.13673@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2A2F5D7E-084E-4810-969B-A107D6C3207A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0611091507100.21374@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxxxxxxx

william(at)elan.net wrote:

> SPF has nothing to do with it and I can use either of "MX", "SRV" or
> "NS" to generate similar amplification scenarios

Maybe add NAPTR to the mix.

Frank

References:
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: Scott Kitterman
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: Scott Kitterman
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: william(at)elan.net
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
  - From: william(at)elan.net

Prev by Date: Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
Next by Date: Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
Previous by thread: Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
Next by thread: Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread