Archive of ietf-mxcomp, by thread
Go to date index
Go to main page for ietf-mxcomp
Page 1 of 12
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
- Re: document,
jwkckid1
- DTBAVPLRAYMZL,
bwijnen
- Mail Server Registries and Foreign Sender Authentication: A Proposal,
Randy Smith
- Doug attack scenarios without SPF,
William Leibzon
- Lonlwgj,
oran
- Trouble with Sender Authentication,
K.J. Petrie
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
wayne
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
wayne
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Dean Anderson
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Greg Hewgill
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
wayne
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Dean Anderson
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Julian Mehnle
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Dean Anderson
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
wayne
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Julian Mehnle
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Julian Mehnle
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Julian Mehnle
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Scott Kitterman
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Scott Kitterman
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Scott Kitterman
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
william(at)elan.net
- Interesting (ab)uses of DNS (was: Trouble with Sender Authentication),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
John Leslie
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
John Levine
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Douglas Otis
- Re: Trouble with Sender Authentication,
Dean Anderson
- Out of Office AutoReply: STATUS,
Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
- ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx,
phoffman
- Message could not be delivered,
rfc-editor
- report,
ned . freed
- Pbsnfjtzk,
hannes . tschofenig
- Mail System Error - Returned Mail,
phoffman
- Fwd: [spf-discuss] IAB Response to the Appeal from Julian Mehnle : ietf-mxcomp,
Constantine A. Murenin
- Appeal of the IESG decision to publish draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Julian Mehnle
A request for your support of: hutzler-spamops-05.txt,
Carl Hutzler
Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* in regards to its recommended use of Resent- header fields in the way that is inconsistant with RFC2822,
william(at)elan.net
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Scott Kitterman
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 inconflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Ned Freed
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Andrew Newton
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>,
Andrew Newton
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID <ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>,
Frank Ellermann
- RE: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflictwith referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 MARID<ietf-mxcomp@xxxxxxx>,
Thomas Gal
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Andrew Newton
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Sam Hartman
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
wayne
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Alan DeKok
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Graham Murray
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Andrew Newton
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
FUD in Meng's "What To Do",
Matthew Elvey
Research question: How many legitimate mail sources are out there?,
Matthew Elvey
A New Great Anti-Spam Tool??,
Hector Santos
FYI: Interesting CAM SPAM court case as it relates to 2821 vs 2822,
Hector Santos
Paper on Path and Cryptographic Authentication Technologies,
william(at)elan.net
draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02.txt,
Douglas Otis
[spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Frank Ellermann
- <Possible follow-ups>
- [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Michael Hammer
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
wayne
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
wayne
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: SPF and SenderID,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: SPF and SenderID,
Ted Hardie
- Re: SPF and SenderID,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: SPF and SenderID,
Ted Hardie
- Re: SPF and SenderID,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: SPF and SenderID - for your comments Chuck,
johnp
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Terry Fielder
- Message not available
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Terry Fielder
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Greg Connor
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Greg Connor
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Greg Connor
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- CSV, DKIM, SPF, reputation (was: SPF and SenderID),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Alan DeKok
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Alan DeKok
- Re: SPF and SenderID,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
John Leslie
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
gconnor
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
John Leslie
- Re: SPF and SenderID,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
John Leslie
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Alan DeKok
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Hector Santos
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Alan DeKok
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Alan DeKok
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- DNA (was: Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID),
Dave Crocker
- Re: DNA,
Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- Re: DNA,
Dave Crocker
- Re: DNA,
Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- Re: DNA,
John Leslie
- Re: DNA,
Kjetil Torgrim Homme
- Re: DNA,
John Leslie
- Re: DNA,
John Leslie
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
John Leslie
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Alan DeKok
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Dave Crocker
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Alan DeKok
- RE: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Scott Kitterman
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Douglas Otis
- RE: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Scott Kitterman
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Hector Santos
- Re: [spf-help] Re: SPF and SenderID,
Dean Anderson
Resent- header fields,
william(at)elan.net
RE: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Re: SPF and SenderID,
Frank Ellermann
RE: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS,
Sauer, Damon
draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Julian Mehnle
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Terry Fielder
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Terry Fielder
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Graham Murray
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Hector Santos
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Graham Murray
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
johnp
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 (was: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- Philosophical discussions (was Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt ),
Alan DeKok
- Re: Philosophical discussions,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Philosophical discussions,
Alan DeKok
- Re: Philosophical discussions,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Philosophical discussions,
Alan DeKok
- Re: Philosophical discussions,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: Philosophical discussions (was Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt ),
Douglas Otis
- Re: Philosophical discussions (was Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt ),
Alan DeKok
- Re: Philosophical discussions (was Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt ),
Douglas Otis
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Dean Anderson
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Dean Anderson
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Dean Anderson
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Dean Anderson
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Dean Anderson
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Alan DeKok
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Dean Anderson
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-01.txt,
Dean Anderson
RE: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http: //www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Sauer, Damon
RE: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Sukhenko, Alex
- Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Andrew Newton
- Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
william(at)elan.net
- Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Carl Hutzler
- SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Tony Finch
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
william(at)elan.net
- Re: SPF and HELO,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
wayne
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Tony Finch
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
wayne
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
John Levine
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS,
Terry Fielder
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS,
John L
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS,
Terry Fielder
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS,
John L
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS,
Terry Fielder
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS,
wayne
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS,
Terry Fielder
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS,
wayne
- Re: SPF and HELO,
Julian Mehnle
- Re: SPF and HELO, was Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Julian Mehnle
- Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
william(at)elan.net
- Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
John Levine
- Re: SPF PASS,
Terry Fielder
- Re: SPF PASS,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: SPF PASS,
Terry Fielder
- HELO and MAIL FROM are separate identities; reputation on a per-domain basis instead of per-IP (was: SPF PASS),
Julian Mehnle
- Re: SPF PASS,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: SPF PASS,
wayne
- overall HELO FAIL (was: SPF PASS),
Frank Ellermann
- Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
wayne
- Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Julian Mehnle
- Re: SPF PASS,
Frank Ellermann
- RE: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Mark
- Addressing Backward Compatibility [was Re: SPF PASS],
Hector Santos
- Re: Addressing Backward Compatibility [was Re: SPF PASS],
Carl Hutzler
- RE: Addressing Backward Compatibility [was Re: SPF PASS],
John Glube
- Re: SPF PASS,
Frank Ellermann
- RE: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Scott Kitterman
- Re: SPF PASS (was: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundam entally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/"),
Carl Hutzler
"If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Douglas Otis
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Julian Mehnle
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Carl Hutzler
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
wayne
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http: //www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
John Levine
- RE: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Mark
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Arnt Gulbrandsen
- RE: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Mark
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Carl Hutzler
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
wayne
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed,please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Julian Mehnle
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Richard Clayton
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
wayne
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Richard Clayton
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Terry Fielder
- Re: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
wayne
- RE: "If you believe that the SPF concept is fundamentally flawed, please subscribe at http://www.imc.org/ietf-mxcomp/",
Mark
draft-lyon-senderid-core-01.txt,
Douglas Otis
MARID back from the grave?,
Stephane Bortzmeyer
[So... what gives?] RE: So here it is one year later...,
Gordon Fecyk
So here it is one year later...,
Gordon Fecyk
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
wayne
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
wayne
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Andrew Newton
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
wayne
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Andrew Newton
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
wayne
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
gmc
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Ian Rogers
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
David Woodhouse
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
K.F.J. Martens
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Hector Santos
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
David Woodhouse
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
David Woodhouse
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
wayne
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Hector Santos
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Hector Santos
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Hector Santos
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Douglas Otis
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Alan DeKok
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
wayne
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Alan DeKok
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Alan DeKok
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
william(at)elan.net
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
wayne
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Alan DeKok
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Frank Ellermann
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Dean Anderson
- RE: So here it is one year later...,
terry
- RE: So here it is one year later...,
Dean Anderson
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
gmc
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Dean Anderson
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Justin Mason
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Dean Anderson
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Dean Anderson
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Justin Mason
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Justin Mason
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Dean Anderson
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Dean Anderson
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Justin Mason
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
Dean Anderson
- Re: So here it is one year later...,
mxcomp
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: So here it is one year later...,
Gordon Fecyk
- RE: So here it is one year later...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: So here it is one year later...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: So here it is one year later...,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip
DEA Directorate,
william(at)elan.net
Abusive blacklist,
Dean Anderson
Email Security Glossary,
william(at)elan.net
RE: blowback, was A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Matthew.van.Eerde
Approaches to system design - Marketing vs Security and why MASG should not be standards group (was: [spf-discuss] Re: MAAWG whitepaper draft),
william(at)elan.net
Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Hector Santos
Re: Complaint on personal attack by Matthew Elvey by Dean Anderson of av8. (fwd),
Dean Anderson
Source routing -- why not?,
John Levine
RE: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Thomas Gal
Re: Complaint on personal attack by Matthew Elvey,
Danny Angus
Re: path routing,
John R Levine
FTC stuff 0) Lies 1)Yahoo & DK. 2)GoDaddy DNS & SPF & CSV. 3)Dean & FUSSP. 4)Testing 5)EFF, Anonymity.,
Matthew Elvey
- Re: FTC stuff 0) Lies 1)Yahoo & DK. 2)GoDaddy DNS & SPF & CSV. 3)Dean & FUSSP. 4)Testing 5)EFF, Anonymity.,
Alan DeKok
- Re: FTC stuff 0) Lies 1)Yahoo & DK. 2)GoDaddy DNS & SPF & CSV. 3)Dean & FUSSP. 4)Testing 5)EFF, Anonymity.,
Dave Crocker
- Re: FTC stuff 0) Lies 1)Yahoo & DK. 2)GoDaddy DNS & SPF & CSV. 3)Dean & FUSSP. 4)Testing 5)EFF, Anonymity.,
Hector Santos
- Re: FTC stuff 0) Lies 1)Yahoo & DK. 2)GoDaddy DNS & SPF & CSV. 3)Dean & FUSSP. 4)Testing 5)EFF, Anonymity.,
Alan DeKok
- Re: FTC stuff 0) Lies 1)Yahoo & DK. 2)GoDaddy DNS & SPF & CSV. 3)Dean & FUSSP. 4)Testing 5)EFF, Anonymity.,
Dave Crocker
- Re: FTC stuff 0) Lies 1)Yahoo & DK. 2)GoDaddy DNS & SPF & CSV. 3)Dean & FUSSP. 4)Testing 5)EFF, Anonymity.,
Alan DeKok
- A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Hector Santos
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Andrew Newton
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
David Woodhouse
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Alan DeKok
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
william(at)elan.net
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Alan DeKok
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
David Woodhouse
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Hector Santos
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Douglas Otis
- Message not available
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Hector Santos
- Message not available
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Hector Santos
- Message not available
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Hector Santos
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Hector Santos
- Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........],
Matthew Elvey
Page 1 of 12
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [First Page]
[Last Page]
The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail
Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections
to this Web page, please send them to
phoffman@imc.org.