Archive of ietf-openpgp, by date

• Re: nt implementations, William H. Geiger III, 07/24/1998
• Re: KeyId subpackets, William H. Geiger III, 07/24/1998
• Re: Another typo in draft-06, William H. Geiger III, 07/24/1998
• Re: KeyId subpackets, Ian Brown, 07/24/1998
• Another typo in draft-06, Andrew Bromage, 07/23/1998
• Re: KeyId subpackets, Hal Finney, 07/23/1998
• Re: KeyId subpackets, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/23/1998
• Re: KeyId subpackets, Hal Finney, 07/23/1998
• Length specifiers, Ian Brown, 07/23/1998
• KeyId subpackets, Ian Brown, 07/23/1998
• Re: ElGamal Reference Paper, Cypherlist-Watch Owner, 07/22/1998
• nt implementations, Christian Kanja, 07/22/1998
• ElGamal Reference Paper, William H. Geiger III, 07/22/1998
• Fwd: 42nd IETF-CHICAGO, IL: OPENPGP, John W. Noerenberg, 07/21/1998
• Sig-only weasel words, Jon Callas, 07/20/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, Jon Callas, 07/20/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, Jon Callas, 07/20/1998
• Re: Corrections in latest draft, Jon Callas, 07/20/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/20/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, Werner Koch, 07/20/1998
• Corrections in latest draft, Andrew Bromage, 07/20/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, Hal Finney, 07/19/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, Werner Koch, 07/19/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/18/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/18/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, Hal Finney, 07/18/1998
• Re: IETF August meeting -- aiming at Friday, Tony Mione, 07/18/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, Werner Koch, 07/18/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, Hal Finney, 07/18/1998
• Re: opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, Werner Koch, 07/18/1998
• opgp99s.tgz - update, final call, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/17/1998
• Re: Sign Only implimenation., Paul Hoffman / IMC, 07/17/1998
• IETF August meeting -- aiming at Friday, John W. Noerenberg, 07/17/1998
• Re: Sign Only implimenation., dontspam-tzeruch, 07/17/1998
• Re: Sign Only implimenation., William H. Geiger III, 07/17/1998
• Re: Sign Only implimenation., Jon Callas, 07/17/1998
• Re: What this WG is doing, Jon Callas, 07/17/1998
• Re: What this WG is doing, Hal Finney, 07/17/1998
• Re: What this WG is doing, William H. Geiger III, 07/17/1998
• Re: What this WG is doing, bill . stewart, 07/17/1998
• Sign Only implimenation., ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}, 07/16/1998
• Re: about MDCs etc (Re: Long Holiday?), Adam Back, 07/16/1998
• ACM CCCS'98: Preliminary Program and Call for Participation, Gene Tsudik, 07/16/1998
• PGPticket draft, Tony Mione, 07/16/1998
• Re: about MDCs etc (Re: Long Holiday?), Jon Callas, 07/14/1998
• Re: One change: 5.2.2, Jon Callas, 07/14/1998
• Re: about MDCs etc (Re: Long Holiday?), Adam Back, 07/14/1998
• One change: 5.2.2, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/14/1998
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-06.txt, Internet-Drafts, 07/14/1998
• References nit, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 07/13/1998
• Re: reserved ID allocation procedure, Jim Gillogly, 07/13/1998
• Re: reserved ID allocation procedure, Paul Koning, 07/13/1998
• Your Home Town Provides Everything You Need, Your Home Town, 07/10/1998
• Re: Formats doc, -06 rev, ready for viewing, Jon Callas, 07/10/1998
• Formats doc, -06 rev, ready for viewing, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 07/10/1998
• Re: reserved ID allocation procedure, Jon Callas, 07/10/1998
• Re: about MDCs etc (Re: Long Holiday?), Jon Callas, 07/10/1998
• Fwd: Re: Patents and draft-ietf-smime-x942-00.txt, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 07/10/1998
• Re: about MDCs etc (Re: Long Holiday?), Adam Back, 07/09/1998
• Re: about MDCs etc (Re: Long Holiday?), Hal Finney, 07/09/1998
• about MDCs etc (Re: Long Holiday?), Adam Back, 07/09/1998
• Re: IMC & OpenPGP (interoperability), dontspam-tzeruch, 07/09/1998
• Re: Long Holiday?, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/09/1998
• Re: reserved ID allocation procedure, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/09/1998
• Re: IMC & OpenPGP, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 07/09/1998
• IMC & OpenPGP, William H. Geiger III, 07/09/1998
• One Pass Signatures, William H. Geiger III, 07/09/1998
• IETF August meeting, John W. Noerenberg, 07/08/1998
• Re: Long Holiday?, John W. Noerenberg, 07/08/1998
• WG Last call will be extended (was Re: Long Holiday?), John W. Noerenberg, 07/08/1998
• Re: Long Holiday?, Adam Back, 07/08/1998
• reserved ID allocation procedure, Adam Back, 07/08/1998
• Re: Long Holiday?, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/08/1998
• Re: Algorithm Decisions, John W. Noerenberg, 07/08/1998
• Re: Algorithm patents a US only problem?, John W. Noerenberg, 07/08/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), John W. Noerenberg, 07/08/1998
• Long Holiday?, John W. Noerenberg, 07/08/1998
• Re: Algorithm patents a US only problem?, Hironobu Suzuki, 07/02/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/02/1998
• Algorithm patents a US only problem?, William H. Geiger III, 07/02/1998
• Re: Algorithm Decisions, Werner Koch, 07/02/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example, William H. Geiger III, 07/02/1998
• Re: Algorithm Decisions, dontspam-tzeruch, 07/02/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example, Lindsay Mathieson, 07/02/1998
• Algorithm Decisions, Jon Callas, 07/01/1998
• Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Uri Blumenthal, 07/01/1998
• Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Uri Blumenthal, 07/01/1998
• Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Adam Back, 07/01/1998
• Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Adam Back, 07/01/1998
• Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Paul Koning, 07/01/1998
• Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Uri Blumenthal, 07/01/1998
• Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Adam Back, 07/01/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example, Hironobu Suzuki, 07/01/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), William H. Geiger III, 07/01/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), Uri Blumenthal, 07/01/1998
• Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, Paul Koning, 07/01/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}, 07/01/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example, William H. Geiger III, 07/01/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example, Werner Koch, 07/01/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), William H. Geiger III, 07/01/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), Uri Blumenthal, 06/30/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), dontspam-tzeruch, 06/30/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), Paul Lambert, 06/30/1998
• Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, Uri Blumenthal, 06/30/1998
• Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/30/1998
• Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, Uri Blumenthal, 06/30/1998
• Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/30/1998
• Re: undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), Uri Blumenthal, 06/30/1998
• Re: Undefined and underdefined algorithms, Uri Blumenthal, 06/30/1998
• Re: stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Uri Blumenthal, 06/30/1998
• Re: What is MAY NOT, Jon Callas, 06/30/1998
• Undefined and underdefined algorithms, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 06/30/1998
• Re: What is MAY NOT, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 06/30/1998
• What is MAY NOT, Werner Koch, 06/30/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Werner Koch, 06/30/1998
• Re: areas of spec incomplete? (Re: Question and note), dontspam-tzeruch, 06/29/1998
• undefined MAY algorithm example (Re: Question and note), Adam Back, 06/29/1998
• stream ciphers (Re: 128 bit block ciphers), Adam Back, 06/29/1998
• Re: Question and note, Jon Callas, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal, 06/29/1998
• Re: Question and note, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 06/29/1998
• Re: Question and note, Uri Blumenthal, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/29/1998
• areas of spec incomplete? (Re: Question and note), Adam Back, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Jon Callas, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/29/1998
• Re: Question and note, Tim Hudson, 06/29/1998
• Re: Question and note, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/29/1998
• Re: Question and note, Jon Callas, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/29/1998
• MAY use X where X is variable or undefined..., dontspam-tzeruch, 06/29/1998
• Re: Question and note, Uri Blumenthal, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Uri Blumenthal, 06/29/1998
• Re: Question and note, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 06/29/1998
• Re: Secret Key Packet III, Christoph Moser, 06/29/1998
• Secret Key Packets III, Christoph Moser, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Werner Koch, 06/29/1998
• Re: 128 bit block ciphers, Lutz Donnerhacke, 06/29/1998
• Re: Question and note, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/29/1998
• 128 bit block ciphers, Werner Koch, 06/29/1998
• Secret Key Packets II, Christoph Moser, 06/28/1998
• Re: Question and note, Uri Blumenthal, 06/28/1998
• Re: Question and note, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/28/1998
• preventing Gary Howland's attack, Adam Back, 06/28/1998
• Re: Question and note, Uri Blumenthal, 06/26/1998
• Re: Secret Key Packets, William H. Geiger III, 06/26/1998
• Secret Key Packets, Christoph Moser, 06/26/1998
• Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-formats, Jon Callas, 06/25/1998
• Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-formats, Ryan Anderson, 06/25/1998
• Re: Question and note, Jon Callas, 06/25/1998
• Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-formats, Adam Back, 06/25/1998
• WG Last Call: draft-ietf-openpgp-formats, John W. Noerenberg, 06/25/1998
• Question and note, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/24/1998
• Additions to draft, Jon Callas, 06/24/1998
• Re: More Typos, Jon Callas, 06/22/1998
• Re: Problem with Version 4 subpackets :(, Jon Callas, 06/22/1998
• Re: Problem with Version 4 subpackets :(, Jon Callas, 06/22/1998
• Re: Minor typo in 11.2, Jon Callas, 06/18/1998
• More Typos, Noah Salzman, 06/18/1998
• Problem with Version 4 subpackets :(, William H. Geiger III, 06/18/1998
• Another typo, Jon Callas, 06/17/1998
• Minor typo in 11.2, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/17/1998
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-05.txt, Internet-Drafts, 06/17/1998
• Re: Changing HAVAL definition., Hal Finney, 06/16/1998
• Re: Changing HAVAL definition., Werner Koch, 06/16/1998
• Re: Changing HAVAL definition., dontspam-tzeruch, 06/16/1998
• Changing HAVAL definition., Jon Callas, 06/16/1998
• Re: Hash of Keys and Sync of Servers, Michael Baumer, 06/15/1998
• Re: Another draft coming your way., Hal Finney, 06/15/1998
• Relevant diffs between -04 and -05, Jon Callas, 06/15/1998
• Another draft coming your way., Jon Callas, 06/15/1998
• Re: Hash of Keys and Sync of Servers, William H. Geiger III, 06/15/1998
• Re: Hash of Keys and Sync of Servers, Michael Baumer, 06/15/1998
• Hash of Keys and Sync of Servers, William H. Geiger III, 06/15/1998
• List of PGP Public Keyservers, William H. Geiger III, 06/12/1998
• Re: Armor Headers in 04, Hal Finney, 06/11/1998
• [no subject], 3rstyhd, 06/10/1998
• Re: Armor Headers in 04, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/10/1998
• Re: Armor Headers in 04, Jon Callas, 06/10/1998
• Re: More (some already reported) spec nits, Jon Callas, 06/10/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Ulf Möller, 06/09/1998
• Re: PGPticket, Tony Mione, 06/09/1998
• OFF TOPIC: PGP Plug In for Outlook Express, Domenico Rotondi, 06/08/1998
• Re: PGPticket, Vinnie Moscaritolo, 06/08/1998
• Re: PGPticket, Bill Stewart, 06/08/1998
• Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Bill Stewart, 06/07/1998
• Armor Headers in 04, Lutz Donnerhacke, 06/05/1998
• Minor updates to opgp & palmopgp, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/04/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Hal Finney, 06/04/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Philip Zimmermann, 06/04/1998
• Re: More (some already reported) spec nits, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/04/1998
• Re: More (some already reported) spec nits, Hal Finney, 06/04/1998
• More (some already reported) spec nits, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/04/1998
• Re: AGAIN: "Hash:" either SHOULD be used, or default to MD5, Jon Callas, 06/03/1998
• AGAIN: "Hash:" either SHOULD be used, or default to MD5, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/03/1998
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 06/03/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Ulf Möller, 06/03/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Werner Koch, 06/03/1998
• Re: PGP PKI? (Was: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP), Jon Callas, 06/02/1998
• PGP PKI? (Was: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP), William H. Geiger III, 06/02/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/02/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 06/02/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Philip Zimmermann, 06/02/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, David Hayes, 06/02/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/02/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Paul Koning, 06/02/1998
• Re: key revocation types (Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys), Jon Callas, 06/02/1998
• Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Jon Callas, 06/02/1998
• Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06/02/1998
• Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Adam Back, 06/02/1998
• Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Adam Back, 06/02/1998
• key revocation types (Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys), Adam Back, 06/02/1998
• Re: The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Werner Koch, 06/02/1998
• The case against ElGamal signatures in PGP, Philip Zimmermann, 06/02/1998
• Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), William H. Geiger III, 06/01/1998
• Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), William H. Geiger III, 06/01/1998
• PalmIII Progress: most things except compression work, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/01/1998
• Re: implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Jon Callas, 06/01/1998
• Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Hal Finney, 06/01/1998
• implicit IDEA with V3 keys (Re: Silence is Consent Dept.), Adam Back, 06/01/1998
• Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, dontspam-tzeruch, 06/01/1998
• Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Jon Callas, 06/01/1998
• Silence is Consent Dept., Jon Callas, 06/01/1998
• Re: Version 4 keystructure, Jon Callas, 06/01/1998
• Chaffing and Winnowing and OpenPGP, Bill Stewart, 05/30/1998
• Re: Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Bill Stewart, 05/29/1998
• Re: Notation subpacket lengths, Hal Finney, 05/29/1998
• Notation subpacket lengths, other things, Jon Callas, 05/29/1998
• Re: does same passphrase = same keys, Noah Salzman, 05/29/1998
• does same passphrase = same keys, joe harlin, 05/29/1998
• Re: Notation subpacket lengths, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/29/1998
• Re: Notation subpacket lengths, Christoph Moser, 05/29/1998
• Re: Notation subpacket lengths, Werner Koch, 05/29/1998
• RE: Notation subpacket lengths, MSovanH RelSec, 05/28/1998
• RE: PGPticket, William H. Geiger III, 05/28/1998
• Re: Notation subpacket lengths, William H. Geiger III, 05/28/1998
• Proposed reason-for-revocation subpacket, Philip Zimmermann, 05/28/1998
• Re:, Jon Callas, 05/28/1998
• Re: Notation subpacket lengths, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/28/1998
• Re: Notation subpacket lengths, Jon Callas, 05/28/1998
• Re: Notation subpacket lengths, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/28/1998
• Re: Notation subpacket lengths, Jon Callas, 05/28/1998
• Notation subpacket lengths, Vinnie Moscaritolo, 05/28/1998
• Re: PGPticket, Vinnie Moscaritolo, 05/27/1998
• Re: PGPticket, Tony Bartoletti, 05/27/1998
• Re: PGPticket, Vinnie Moscaritolo, 05/27/1998
• Algorithm preferences, Jon Callas, 05/27/1998
• Call for participation (FYI), Yahya Al-Salqan, 05/27/1998
• RSA'99 Deadline, Kurt Stammberger, 05/27/1998
• RE: PGPticket, Vinnie Moscaritolo, 05/27/1998
• [no subject], tzeruch, 05/27/1998
• CFP: 1999 Network & Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS '99), David M. Balenson, 05/27/1998
• RE: PGPticket, MSovanH RelSec, 05/26/1998
• PGPticket, Vinnie Moscaritolo, 05/26/1998
• Version 4 keystructure, Patrick Feisthammel, 05/23/1998
• Procedures for updating RFC, William H. Geiger III, 05/21/1998
• Re: Specs & Planks, Jon Callas, 05/20/1998
• Re: Specs & Planks, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 05/20/1998
• Re: Specs & Planks, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/20/1998
• spelling and grammar checking, Jon Callas, 05/20/1998
• Re: Specs & Planks, Jon Callas, 05/20/1998
• Specs & Planks, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/20/1998
• Re: Fixes to draft 03, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/19/1998
• Re: Fixes to draft 03, Hal Finney, 05/19/1998
• Re: Fixes to draft 03, Jon Callas, 05/19/1998
• Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Steve Schear, 05/19/1998
• Re: Fixes to draft 03, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/19/1998
• Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Peter Gutmann, 05/19/1998
• Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Axel H. Horns, 05/19/1998
• Fixes to draft 03, Jon Callas, 05/19/1998
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-03.txt, Internet-Drafts, 05/19/1998
• Re: CTB and Length Type 3, Hal Finney, 05/18/1998
• Re: Armor vs. Binary, Jon Callas, 05/18/1998
• Re: Moving forward, Jon Callas, 05/18/1998
• opgp99k, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/18/1998
• Re: Moving forward, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/17/1998
• opgp99g and j, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/17/1998
• Armor vs. Binary, Christoph Moser, 05/16/1998
• Moving forward, Jon Callas, 05/13/1998
• RE: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Michael Shor, 05/13/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Uri Blumenthal, 05/12/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Paul Lambert, 05/12/1998
• Re: Packet Type 10 (Marker Packet), Jon Callas, 05/11/1998
• Re: CTB and Length Type 3, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/11/1998
• Re: CTB and Length Type 3, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/10/1998
• Re: CTB and Length Type 3, William H. Geiger III, 05/09/1998
• Some spec nits and other things, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/09/1998
• Re: CTB and Length Type 3, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/09/1998
• Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Steve Schear, 05/09/1998
• Packet Type 10 (Marker Packet), William H. Geiger III, 05/09/1998
• CTB and Length Type 3, William H. Geiger III, 05/09/1998
• Re: Compression levels, Andrew Bromage, 05/08/1998
• opgp99f.tgz uploaded, with a pgp50i patch for V4 sigs (on data), dontspam-tzeruch, 05/08/1998
• Re: Compression levels, Paulo Barreto, 05/08/1998
• Compression levels, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/07/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Paulo Barreto, 05/07/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Uri Blumenthal, 05/07/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Paulo Barreto, 05/07/1998
• Fw: MQV Patent, Rich Ankney, 05/06/1998
• Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Paulo Barreto, 05/06/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Uri Blumenthal, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Rich Ankney, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Rich Ankney, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Uri Blumenthal, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Uri Blumenthal, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Uri Blumenthal, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Paulo Barreto, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Rich Ankney, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Uri Blumenthal, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Rich Ankney, 05/05/1998
• RE: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP?, Flanigan, Bill, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Paulo Barreto, 05/05/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Werner Koch, 05/05/1998
• RE: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP?, Jon Callas, 05/04/1998
• opgp99b2.tgz uploaded, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/04/1998
• Re: Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Uri Blumenthal, 05/04/1998
• Subject: Re: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP, Jim Gillogly, 05/04/1998
• Re: Section 6.6 again, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/04/1998
• RE: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP?, Flanigan, Bill, 05/04/1998
• Re: GPG killing PGP?, Werner Koch, 05/04/1998
• GPG killing PGP?, Bill Stewart, 05/03/1998
• Re: Section 6.6 again, Anonymous, 05/03/1998
• Re: Section 6.6 again, Hal Finney, 05/03/1998
• FYI: comment packets, Werner Koch, 05/03/1998
• Section 6.6 again, Secret Squirrel, 05/02/1998
• RE: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP?, Tim Dierks, 05/01/1998
• Re[2]: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP?, Chris Bartram, 05/01/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, Peter Gutmann, 05/01/1998
• RE: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP?, Flanigan, Bill, 05/01/1998
• RE: Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP?, Flanigan, Bill, 05/01/1998
• Legal issues in implementing OpenPGP?, Chris Bartram, 05/01/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, dontspam-tzeruch, 05/01/1998
• Re: Some suggestions, Jon Callas, 04/30/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, Jon Callas, 04/30/1998
• Re: implementing backwards compatibility, Werner Koch, 04/29/1998
• Re: implementing backwards compatibility, Adam Back, 04/29/1998
• Re: implementing backwards compatibility, Werner Koch, 04/29/1998
• Re: implementing backwards compatibility (Re: Some suggestions), dontspam-tzeruch, 04/28/1998
• implementing backwards compatibility (Re: Some suggestions), Adam Back, 04/28/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, Werner Koch, 04/28/1998
• OID for TIGER/192 ?, Werner Koch, 04/28/1998
• Re: Some suggestions (zlib info, and a correction), Werner Koch, 04/28/1998
• Re: Some suggestions (zlib info, and a correction), dontspam-tzeruch, 04/28/1998
• Re: Some suggestions, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/28/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, tzeruch, 04/28/1998
• Re: Some suggestions, Werner Koch, 04/28/1998
• Re: Some suggestions, Bill Frantz, 04/28/1998
• Re: Some suggestions, Werner Koch, 04/28/1998
• Re: Some suggestions, Werner Koch, 04/28/1998
• Re: Some suggestions, Lindsay Mathieson, 04/28/1998
• Some suggestions, Werner Koch, 04/28/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/24/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, Jon Callas, 04/24/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, Hal Finney, 04/24/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/23/1998
• Re: PGP Reference Implementation, Lindsay Mathieson, 04/23/1998
• PGP Reference Implementation, Lindsay Mathieson, 04/23/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, Hal Finney, 04/23/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, Hal Finney, 04/23/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/23/1998
• Re: Before I forget - two more spec questions, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/23/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, Jon Callas, 04/23/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/23/1998
• Re: Before I forget - two more spec questions, Jon Callas, 04/23/1998
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/23/1998
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-formats-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 04/23/1998
• Announcing: opgp98.tgz, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/22/1998
• Before I forget - two more spec questions, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/21/1998
• Re: 11.2 Dual KeyIDs for RSA keys?, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/18/1998
• Re: 11.2 Dual KeyIDs for RSA keys?, Jim Gillogly, 04/18/1998
• Re: 11.2 Dual KeyIDs for RSA keys?, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/17/1998
• Re: 11.2 Dual KeyIDs for RSA keys?, Jim Gillogly, 04/17/1998
• Re: 11.2 Dual KeyIDs for RSA keys?, tzeruch, 04/17/1998
• Re: Elgamal signatures, Bill Stewart, 04/15/1998
• Re: announce: opgp97.tgz - I've gone monolithic, griffin, 04/15/1998
• announce: opgp97.tgz - I've gone monolithic, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/15/1998
• Re: Elgamal signatures, Jon Callas, 04/14/1998
• Re: Elgamal signatures, Jon Callas, 04/14/1998
• Re: Elgamal signatures, Adam Back, 04/14/1998
• Re: Elgamal signatures, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/14/1998
• Re: Elgamal signatures, William H. Geiger III, 04/14/1998
• Re: Elgamal signatures, Jim Gillogly, 04/14/1998
• Elgamal signatures, Jon Callas, 04/14/1998
• update - how to get my latest code, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/14/1998
• Armor CRC clarification, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/13/1998
• SecureConnect 1 announcement, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 04/13/1998
• opgp95 beta 7, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/13/1998
• Why no one-pass symmetric test packet?, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/12/1998
• Well, I did a pgpv command..., dontspam-tzeruch, 04/11/1998
• Re: RSA Key spec question, Jim Gillogly, 04/10/1998
• Re: RSA Key spec question, Bill Stewart, 04/10/1998
• Update: V4 RSA keys work, if they aren't protected, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/09/1998
• preannounce: opgp95, dontspam-tzeruch, 04/09/1998
• Re: character set, Jon Callas, 04/07/1998
• character set, Ulf Möller, 04/07/1998
• Updates - opgp93 soon., dontspam-tzeruch, 04/07/1998
• Re: On my HAVAL implementation, Paulo Barreto, 04/06/1998
• Re: Preliminary V4 RSA key support added. But I can't test..., nospam-seesignature, 04/06/1998
• Re: On my HAVAL implementation, Uri Blumenthal, 04/05/1998
• More spec cleanup/suggestions, nospam-seesignature, 04/05/1998
• Re: Preliminary V4 RSA key support added. But I can't test..., nospam-seesignature, 04/04/1998
• V4 RSA key update., nospam-seesignature, 04/04/1998
• Re: Preliminary V4 RSA key support added. But I can't test..., nospam-seesignature, 04/03/1998
• Re: On my HAVAL implementation, nospam-seesignature, 04/03/1998
• Re: On my HAVAL implementation, Jim Gillogly, 04/03/1998
• Re: V4 RSA keys??? Incongruities, nospam-seesignature, 04/03/1998
• Re: On my HAVAL implementation, Jon Callas, 04/03/1998
• Re: Preliminary V4 RSA key support added. But I can't test..., Jon Callas, 04/03/1998
• Re: V4 RSA keys??? Incongruities, Jon Callas, 04/03/1998
• Re: Preliminary V4 RSA key support added. But I can't test..., nospam-seesignature, 04/03/1998
• Preliminary V4 RSA key support added. But I can't test..., nospam-seesignature, 04/03/1998
• RSA Key spec question, nospam-seesignature, 04/03/1998
• V4 RSA keys??? Incongruities, nospam-seesignature, 04/03/1998
• Re: Wordsmithing in 3.6.3.3, nospam-seesignature, 04/02/1998
• Wordsmithing in 3.6.3.3, Jim Gillogly, 04/02/1998
• Re: Key IDs, Hal Finney, 04/01/1998
• Re: Key IDs, nospam-seesignature, 04/01/1998
• Key IDs, Jim Gillogly, 04/01/1998
• Re: Status from the Working Group Meeting, nospam-seesignature, 04/01/1998
• Status from the Working Group Meeting, Jon Callas, 04/01/1998
• Re: Obvious (?) question about interoperability, nospam-seesignature, 04/01/1998
• Re: Obvious (?) question about interoperability, nospam-seesignature, 04/01/1998
• Re: Why one pass sigs?, nospam-seesignature, 04/01/1998
• Re: Obvious (?) question about interoperability, nospam-seesignature, 04/01/1998
• Re: Obvious (?) question about interoperability, Jon Callas, 03/31/1998
• Re: Obvious (?) question about interoperability, Hal Finney, 03/31/1998
• Re: Why one pass sigs?, Hal Finney, 03/31/1998
• Why one pass sigs?, nospam-seesignature, 03/31/1998
• Obvious (?) question about interoperability, nospam-seesignature, 03/31/1998
• Re: 3DES Weakness, Hal Finney, 03/31/1998
• Re: 3DES Weakness, Hal Finney, 03/31/1998
• Preannounce: opgp92.tgz, nospam-seesignature, 03/31/1998
• Re: 3DES Weakness, William H. Geiger III, 03/31/1998
• Testcases and opgp91f.tgz, nospam-seesignature, 03/30/1998
• Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, nospam-seesignature, 03/30/1998
• Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, John W. Noerenberg, 03/30/1998
• Re: opgp91 uploaded - version d :), nospam-seesignature, 03/30/1998
• Re: Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, nospam-seesignature, 03/30/1998
• Re: opgp91 uploaded, Hal Finney, 03/30/1998
• Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, Hal Finney, 03/30/1998
• Re: Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, Hal Finney, 03/30/1998
• Re: Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, Hal Finney, 03/30/1998
• Test Case set and opgp91a, nospam-seesignature, 03/30/1998
• Test Case set, nospam-seesignature, 03/30/1998
• Re: opgp91 uploaded, nospam-seesignature, 03/30/1998
• Re: Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, nospam-seesignature, 03/30/1998
• On my HAVAL implementation, Paulo Barreto, 03/30/1998
• Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, nospam-seesignature, 03/30/1998
• Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, nospam-seesignature, 03/29/1998
• Re: 10.2 grammar (naked encrypted packets?), nospam-seesignature, 03/29/1998
• Re: 10.2 grammar (naked encrypted packets?), Hal Finney, 03/29/1998
• Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, William H. Geiger III, 03/29/1998
• 10.2 grammar (naked encrypted packets?), nospam-seesignature, 03/29/1998
• Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, nospam-seesignature, 03/29/1998
• Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, Hal Finney, 03/28/1998
• Suggested addition, nospam-seesignature, 03/28/1998
• Signature packets without keyid?, nospam-seesignature, 03/28/1998
• opgp90a uploaded, nospam-seesignature, 03/27/1998
• Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Bill Stewart, 03/27/1998
• Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, nospam-seesignature, 03/27/1998
• Re: Hashed signature material, nospam-seesignature, 03/27/1998
• Re: Hashed signature material, nospam-seesignature, 03/27/1998
• Re: UserID Revocation, William H. Geiger III, 03/27/1998
• Re: 5.2.2 clarification, Jon Callas, 03/27/1998
• 5.2.2 clarification, nospam-seesignature, 03/27/1998
• Re: UserID Revocation, Lutz Donnerhacke, 03/27/1998
• Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3 - more notes, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Re: Nesting different signatures, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3 - more notes, Hal Finney, 03/26/1998
• Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3 - more notes, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Re: Nesting different signatures, Hal Finney, 03/26/1998
• Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Hal Finney, 03/26/1998
• Which is the preferred preference?, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Jon Callas, 03/26/1998
• Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Nesting different signatures, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Hal Finney, 03/26/1998
• Re: More spec-ulations, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Re: More spec-ulations - update, Hal Finney, 03/26/1998
• Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Jon Callas, 03/26/1998
• Re: More spec-ulations, Jon Callas, 03/26/1998
• More spec-ulations - update, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Multiple ASCII hash key?, nospam-seesignature, 03/26/1998
• Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Thomas Roessler, 03/26/1998
• More spec-ulations, nospam-seesignature, 03/25/1998
• Re: MessageID wording paranoia, William Lewis, 03/25/1998
• Re: MessageID wording paranoia, William H. Geiger III, 03/25/1998
• Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Jon Callas, 03/25/1998
• Re: MessageID wording paranoia, William H. Geiger III, 03/25/1998
• Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Jon Callas, 03/25/1998
• Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Hal Finney, 03/25/1998
• MessageID wording paranoia, Thomas Roessler, 03/25/1998
• Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, nospam-seesignature, 03/24/1998
• Re: Algorithms and specifiers, nospam-seesignature, 03/24/1998
• Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Jack Repenning, 03/23/1998

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.