Archive of ietf-openpgp, by date

• OT Qualcomm bouncing attachments, William H. Geiger III, 09/20/2000
• Re: S2K and Tag 0x05 Q, Erron Criddle, 09/05/2000
• Re: S2K and Tag 0x05 Q, hal, 09/05/2000
• S2K and Tag 0x05 Q, Erron Criddle, 09/05/2000
• Re: web page on Web of Trust, hal, 09/03/2000
• Re: web page on Web of Trust, hal, 09/03/2000
• web page on Web of Trust, Carl Ellison, 09/02/2000
• FlowerFunds - Fund Raising Program, sfaquestions, 08/30/2000
• Re: subkey binding sigs q, Tom Zerucha, 08/28/2000
• Re: subkey binding sigs q, Erron Criddle, 08/28/2000
• Re: RFC2440bis?, Jon Callas, 08/27/2000
• RFC2440bis?, William H. Geiger III, 08/27/2000
• Fiber Optic Cable Needed !!, pmilea, 08/26/2000
• Re: subkey binding sigs q, hal, 08/25/2000
• subkey binding sigs q, Erron Criddle, 08/25/2000
• Re: Serious bug in PGP - versions 5 and 6, Adam Back, 08/24/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, Terje Elde, 08/24/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, L. Sassaman, 08/23/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, Terje Elde, 08/23/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, sen_ml, 08/23/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, Terje Elde, 08/23/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, Werner Koch, 08/23/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, hal, 08/22/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, Erron Criddle, 08/22/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, Erron Criddle, 08/22/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, sen_ml, 08/22/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, hal, 08/22/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, L. Sassaman, 08/22/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, William H. Geiger III, 08/22/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, William H. Geiger III, 08/22/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, Erron Criddle, 08/22/2000
• Re: mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, L. Sassaman, 08/22/2000
• mail client implementations problem? bcc and encrypting to multiple recipients, sen_ml, 08/21/2000
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-multsig-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 08/08/2000
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-mime-02.txt, Internet-Drafts, 08/08/2000
• Re: OpenPGP as a standard, Peter Gutmann, 08/04/2000
• Re: OpenPGP as a standard, hal, 08/04/2000
• Re: OpenPGP as a standard, Jon Callas, 08/04/2000
• Re: OpenPGP as a standard, Erron Criddle, 08/04/2000
• Re: OpenPGP as a standard, Werner Koch, 08/04/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, Ian Brown, 08/04/2000
• Re: OpenPGP as a standard, sen_ml, 08/04/2000
• OpenPGP as a standard, Erron Criddle, 08/04/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, hal, 08/03/2000
• Re: From Lorraine,as promised,I can lower your bill, callback123, 07/29/2000
• Re: CFB padding q, Jeroen C. van Gelderen, 07/29/2000
• Re: CFB padding q, Erron Criddle, 07/28/2000
• Re: CFB padding q, Edwin Woudt, 07/28/2000
• CFB padding q, Erron Criddle, 07/28/2000
• Re: dash escaped text and cleartext sig. q, Tom Zerucha, 07/25/2000
• Re: dash escaped text and cleartext sig. q, Erron Criddle, 07/25/2000
• Re: Recommended 5.3 wording change, sen_ml, 07/23/2000
• Re: final q re sigs., Erron Criddle, 07/23/2000
• Re: final q re sigs., hal, 07/23/2000
• Re: final q re sigs., Erron Criddle, 07/23/2000
• Re: final q re sigs., sen_ml, 07/23/2000
• final q re sigs., Erron Criddle, 07/23/2000
• Re: Y2K is over, Bodo Moeller, 07/23/2000
• Re: The price of the one v.s. the price of the many, Tom Zerucha, 07/21/2000
• Re: The price of the one v.s. the price of the many, Paul Koning, 07/21/2000
• Re: Y2K is over, wolfgang, 07/21/2000
• Re: Correction reqd. in 5.2, Bill Frantz, 07/21/2000
• Re: Correction reqd. in 5.2, Erron Criddle, 07/20/2000
• Re: Recommended 5.3 wording change, sen_ml, 07/20/2000
• Re: Recommended 5.3 wording change, hal, 07/20/2000
• Re: Correction reqd. in 5.2, hal, 07/20/2000
• Re: Correction reqd. in 5.2, Erron Criddle, 07/20/2000
• Re: Correction reqd. in 5.2, Jon Callas, 07/20/2000
• Recommended 5.3 wording change, Erron Criddle, 07/20/2000
• Correction reqd. in 5.2, Erron Criddle, 07/20/2000
• Correction reqd. in 5.5.2, Erron Criddle, 07/20/2000
• The price of the one v.s. the price of the many, Tom Zerucha, 07/20/2000
• Re: Y2K is over, Jon Callas, 07/20/2000
• Re: Y2K is over, hal, 07/20/2000
• Y2K is over, kryptobunny, 07/20/2000
• dash escaped text and cleartext sig. q, Erron Criddle, 07/20/2000
• Re: sig. subpacket & length conflicts?, hal, 07/19/2000
• Re: 2.1, 2.2 and 10.2 Clarification re sigs., sen, 07/19/2000
• Re: sig. subpacket & length conflicts?, sen_ml, 07/19/2000
• Re: sig. subpacket & length conflicts?, Erron Criddle, 07/19/2000
• Re: 2.1, 2.2 and 10.2 Clarification re sigs., Erron Criddle, 07/19/2000
• Tuition-Free Computer and IT Training for Non-Profit Employees, scholarships, 07/19/2000
• Re: Signature Subpacket format questions, Jon Callas, 07/19/2000
• Re: 2.1, 2.2 and 10.2 Clarification re sigs., hal, 07/19/2000
• Re: sig. subpacket & length conflicts?, hal, 07/19/2000
• Re: sig. subpacket & length conflicts?, sen_ml, 07/19/2000
• Re: sig. subpacket & length conflicts?, Erron Criddle, 07/19/2000
• Re: sig. subpacket & length conflicts?, sen_ml, 07/19/2000
• sig. subpacket & length conflicts?, Erron Criddle, 07/19/2000
• Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16, sen_ml, 07/19/2000
• Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16, sen_ml, 07/19/2000
• Re: 2.1, 2.2 and 10.2 Clarification re sigs., sen_ml, 07/19/2000
• Re: Signature Subpacket format questions, sen_ml, 07/19/2000
• Re: CFB Mode correction in 12.8?, Erron Criddle, 07/18/2000
• Re: CFB Mode correction in 12.8?, Jon Callas, 07/18/2000
• Re: CFB Mode correction in 12.8?, Tom Zerucha, 07/18/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME: encoding restrictions., Thomas Roessler, 07/18/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME: encoding restrictions., Ian Bell, 07/18/2000
• CFB Mode correction in 12.8?, Erron Criddle, 07/17/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., TWOFISH), PGP7, Jon Callas, 07/17/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., TWOFISH), PGP7, Jon Callas, 07/17/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., TWOFISH), PGP7, hal, 07/17/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., TWOFISH), PGP7, Tom Zerucha, 07/17/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., TWOFISH), PGP7, hal, 07/17/2000
• Re[2]: VPN Systems via OpenPGP, Marcel Zamzow, 07/17/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., TWOFISH), PGP7, Paul Koning, 07/17/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., TWOFISH), PGP7, Werner Koch, 07/17/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., TWOFISH), PGP7, Michael Young, 07/17/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., Blowfish), PGP7, Werner Koch, 07/17/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, Adam Back, 07/16/2000
• Re: Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., Blowfish), PGP7, hal, 07/16/2000
• Resolution on large-block ciphers (e.g., Blowfish), PGP7, Michael Young, 07/16/2000
• Re: q re binding user id's and subkeys, hal, 07/16/2000
• PGP/MIME: encoding restrictions., Thomas Roessler, 07/16/2000
• Re: q re binding user id's and subkeys, Erron Criddle, 07/15/2000
• Signature Subpacket format questions, Edwin Woudt, 07/15/2000
• Re: VPN Systems via OpenPGP, L. Sassaman, 07/14/2000
• Re: q re binding user id's and subkeys, hal, 07/14/2000
• q re binding user id's and subkeys, Erron Criddle, 07/13/2000
• VPN Systems via OpenPGP, Marcel Zamzow, 07/13/2000
• Re: V4 Sig. incomplete?, hal, 07/13/2000
• Re: V4 Sig. incomplete?, Erron Criddle, 07/13/2000
• Re: V4 Sig. incomplete?, hal, 07/12/2000
• Re: V4 Sig. incomplete?, Erron Criddle, 07/12/2000
• Re: V4 Sig. incomplete?, hal, 07/12/2000
• Re: q re 5.1; is it m*(y**k) or (m*y)**k ?, hal, 07/12/2000
• V4 Sig. incomplete?, Erron Criddle, 07/12/2000
• q re 5.1; is it m*(y**k) or (m*y)**k ?, Erron Criddle, 07/12/2000
• Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16, L. Sassaman, 07/11/2000
• Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16, Werner Koch, 07/11/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, L. Sassaman, 07/10/2000
• Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16, Jon Callas, 07/10/2000
• Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16, L. Sassaman, 07/10/2000
• Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16, L. Sassaman, 07/10/2000
• Re: 2.1, 2.2 and 10.2 Clarification re sigs., sen_ml, 07/09/2000
• 2.1, 2.2 and 10.2 Clarification re sigs., Erron Criddle, 07/09/2000
• Re: 5.1 Clarification re padding, hal, 07/09/2000
• Re: 5.1 Clarification re padding, sen_ml, 07/09/2000
• Re: 5.1 Clarification re padding, Erron Criddle, 07/09/2000
• Re: 5.1 Clarification re padding, sen_ml, 07/09/2000
• Re: Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16, sen_ml, 07/09/2000
• Re: 5.1 Clarification re padding, Erron Criddle, 07/09/2000
• Re: 5.1 Clarification re padding, Ulf M鰈ler, 07/08/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, Will Price, 07/08/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, Ian BROWN, 07/08/2000
• Re: 5.1 Clarification re padding, sen_ml, 07/08/2000
• 5.1 Clarification re padding, Erron Criddle, 07/07/2000
• Question regarding 2440:5.2.3.16, L. Sassaman, 07/07/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, Will Price, 07/07/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, hal, 07/07/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, Ian BROWN, 07/07/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, Ben Laurie, 07/06/2000
• Re: Forward secrecy, sen_ml, 07/06/2000
• priority of clarity of specifications (was Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP), sen_ml, 07/05/2000
• Forward secrecy, Ian Brown, 07/05/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Ben Laurie, 07/05/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Jon Callas, 07/05/2000
• Re: Implementation doc., sen_ml, 07/04/2000
• Implementation doc., Erron Criddle, 06/29/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Ulf M鰈ler, 06/29/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, sen_ml, 06/29/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Andrea Liles, 06/29/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Werner Koch, 06/29/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, sen_ml, 06/29/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Werner Koch, 06/29/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Ulf M鰈ler, 06/28/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, sen_ml, 06/28/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Werner Koch, 06/28/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, sen_ml, 06/26/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Erron Criddle, 06/26/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Erron Criddle, 06/26/2000
• Perl/CGI integration??, Michael Walker, 06/26/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Thomas Roessler, 06/26/2000
• Re: OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Werner Koch, 06/26/2000
• OpenPGP should be called ClosedPGP, Erron Criddle, 06/24/2000
• Re: V4 signature Q, sen_ml, 06/23/2000
• V4 signature Q, Erron Criddle, 06/23/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, L. Sassaman, 06/23/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Bodo Moeller, 06/22/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, sen_ml, 06/22/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, L. Sassaman, 06/22/2000
• Re: Revised MDC packet spec, Michael Young, 06/22/2000
• Re: Do sigs. on encoded data confirm to OpenPGP?, sen_ml, 06/20/2000
• Re: Quick Triple-DES Q, Michael H. Warfield, 06/20/2000
• Signature subpacket clarification, Florian Weimer, 06/20/2000
• Do sigs. on encoded data confirm to OpenPGP?, Erron Criddle, 06/20/2000
• Open-PGP Q re DSA and keys > 1024 bit, Erron Criddle, 06/19/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Bodo Moeller, 06/19/2000
• Re: Revised MDC packet spec, Tom Zerucha, 06/16/2000
• Re: Revised MDC packet spec, Jon Callas, 06/16/2000
• Re: Revised MDC packet spec, hal, 06/16/2000
• Re: Revised MDC packet spec, Tom Zerucha, 06/16/2000
• Re: Revised MDC packet spec, Werner Koch, 06/16/2000
• Revised MDC packet spec, hal, 06/15/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/15/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, hal, 06/15/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/15/2000
• Re: Is there a fully searchable Open-PGP Archive?, sen_ml, 06/15/2000
• Is there a fully searchable Open-PGP Archive?, Erron Criddle, 06/14/2000
• Open-PGP Q re DSA and keys > 1024 bit, Erron Criddle, 06/12/2000
• Re: Hidden session key generation & storage, Paul Koning, 06/12/2000
• Hidden session key generation & storage, Erron Criddle, 06/11/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, ned . freed, 06/11/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/11/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/11/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, Ian Bell, 06/09/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, ned . freed, 06/08/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/08/2000
• Shocking LOSE 10-100lbs. DESTINY, zainprov, 06/08/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, ned . freed, 06/07/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/07/2000
• Re: patents?, Rodney Thayer, 06/07/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, ned . freed, 06/06/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/06/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, ned . freed, 06/06/2000
• Re: 3.6.1.3 Clarification, sen_ml, 06/06/2000
• 3.6.1.3 Clarification, Erron Criddle, 06/06/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Florian Weimer, 06/05/2000
• Re: Quick Triple-DES Q, Erron Criddle, 06/04/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/04/2000
• Re: Quick Triple-DES Q, Jon Callas, 06/04/2000
• Quick Triple-DES Q, Erron Criddle, 06/04/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, ned . freed, 06/04/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/04/2000
• Re: Packet Numbers, L. Sassaman, 06/04/2000
• Packet Numbers, William H. Geiger III, 06/03/2000
• Re: patents?, Dave Crocker, 06/02/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, ned . freed, 06/02/2000
• Re: easy to understand openpgp book/doc?, sen_ml, 06/02/2000
• Re: confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, Ian BROWN, 06/02/2000
• easy to understand openpgp book/doc?, Erron Criddle, 06/02/2000
• confidential subject lines -> use content description field w/ pgp/mime?, sen_ml, 06/02/2000
• Re: patents?, William H. Geiger III, 06/01/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Bodo Moeller, 05/31/2000
• Re: patents?, Dave Crocker, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Frank Tobin, 05/31/2000
• Re: patents?, Rodney Thayer, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, hal, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Bodo Moeller, 05/31/2000
• Re: patents?, William H. Geiger III, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, L. Sassaman, 05/31/2000
• patents?, Ulf M鰈ler, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, hal, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, hal, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Bodo Moeller, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Lutz Donnerhacke, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Lutz Donnerhacke, 05/31/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, hal, 05/30/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Paul Koning, 05/30/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, L. Sassaman, 05/30/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Paul Koning, 05/30/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Werner Koch, 05/30/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Lutz Donnerhacke, 05/30/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Paul Koning, 05/30/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Florian Weimer, 05/30/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, William H. Geiger III, 05/29/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Werner Koch, 05/28/2000
• Re: questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), sen_ml, 05/27/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Florian Weimer, 05/27/2000
• Re: questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), Jon Callas, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Jon Callas, 05/26/2000
• Re: Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Jon Callas, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, L. Sassaman, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, L. Sassaman, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Paul Koning, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Paul Koning, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Werner Koch, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Lutz Donnerhacke, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, hal, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, David P. Kemp, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Marc Horowitz, 05/26/2000
• Behavior of implementations regarding certain key material, Florian Weimer, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Thomas Roessler, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, L. Sassaman, 05/26/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, L. Sassaman, 05/26/2000
• Re: questions: packet tag or content tag (4.3), what is placed in hashed subpacket field (5.2.3), critical bit (5.2.3.1, sen_ml, 05/25/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, Jon Callas, 05/25/2000
• Re: KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, sen_ml, 05/25/2000
• Re: minor typos/points?, sen_ml, 05/25/2000
• KeyID as left vs right substring of fingerprint, hal, 05/25/2000
• Re: questions: packet tag or content tag (4.3), what is placed in hashed subpacket field (5.2.3), critical bit (5.2.3.1, William H. Geiger III, 05/25/2000
• Re: minor typos/points?, William H. Geiger III, 05/25/2000
• Key Generation Security Flaw in PGP 5.0, Don Davis, 05/24/2000
• FYI: Key Generation Security Flaw in PGP 5.0, Thomas Roessler, 05/24/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME: Time for last call?, Ian Bell, 05/23/2000
• Re: minor typos/points?, sen_ml, 05/22/2000
• Re: minor typos/points?, hal, 05/22/2000
• Re: questions: packet tag or content tag (4.3), what is placed in hashed subpacket field (5.2.3), critical bit (5.2.3.1), default user id (5.2.3.3), hal, 05/22/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME: Time for last call?, Thomas Roessler, 05/22/2000
• minor typos/points?, sen_ml, 05/22/2000
• Re: questions: packet tag or content tag (4.3), what is placed in hashed subpacket field (5.2.3), critical bit (5.2.3.1), default user id (5.2.3.3), sen_ml, 05/22/2000
• Re: questions: packet tag or content tag (4.3), what is placed in hashed subpacket field (5.2.3), critical bit (5.2.3.1), default user id (5.2.3.3), L. Sassaman, 05/18/2000
• Re: questions: packet tag or content tag (4.3), what is placed in hashed subpacket field (5.2.3), critical bit (5.2.3.1), default user id (5.2.3.3), sen_ml, 05/18/2000
• Re: questions: packet tag or content tag (4.3), what is placed in hashed subpacket field (5.2.3), critical bit (5.2.3.1), default user id (5.2.3.3), hal, 05/18/2000
• Re: questions: packet tag or content tag (4.3), what is placed in hashed subpacket field (5.2.3), critical bit (5.2.3.1), default user id (5.2.3.3), L. Sassaman, 05/18/2000
• questions: packet tag or content tag (4.3), what is placed in hashed subpacket field (5.2.3), critical bit (5.2.3.1), default user id (5.2.3.3), sen_ml, 05/18/2000
• Re: questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), sen_ml, 05/17/2000
• Re: questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), hal, 05/17/2000
• Re: questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), sen_ml, 05/17/2000
• Re: questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), sen_ml, 05/15/2000
• Re: questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), hal, 05/15/2000
• Re: questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), sen_ml, 05/15/2000
• Re: questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), hal, 05/15/2000
• questions about sections 3.6.1.2 and 3.6.1.3 (was Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?), sen_ml, 05/15/2000
• Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?, Jon Callas, 05/15/2000
• Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?, sen_ml, 05/13/2000
• Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?, Paul Koning, 05/12/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME: Time for last call?, Ian Bell, 05/12/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME: Time for last call?, Thomas Roessler, 05/12/2000
• Re: question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?, hal, 05/12/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME: Time for last call?, Florian Weimer, 05/12/2000
• question about section 3.6.1.1 simple s2k: how does preloading work?, sen_ml, 05/12/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME: Time for last call?, Ian Bell, 05/11/2000
• Re: suggesting displaying processed message before sending + confirmation (cf. rfc 2368), sen_ml, 05/10/2000
• Re: suggesting displaying processed message before sending + confirmation (cf. rfc 2368), Werner Koch, 05/10/2000
• PGP/MIME: Time for last call?, Thomas Roessler, 05/10/2000
• Re: suggesting displaying processed message before sending + confirmation (cf. rfc 2368), sen_ml, 05/10/2000
• Re: suggesting displaying processed message before sending + confirmation (cf. rfc 2368), Werner Koch, 05/10/2000
• suggesting displaying processed message before sending + confirmation (cf. rfc 2368), sen_ml, 05/09/2000
• Instant On-Line Credit Reports, Charlie Fletcher - www.ukdata.com, 05/09/2000
• CFP: ISOC Netw & Distr Sys Security Symp (NDSS'01), David M. Balenson, 05/09/2000
• You Gota See!, $ Mafiouso, 04/25/2000
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-mime-01.txt, Internet-Drafts, 04/21/2000
• Re: Two AES ciphers, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 04/10/2000
• Re: Two AES ciphers, Peter Gutmann, 04/10/2000
• Re: Return to MDC packet discussion, Werner Koch, 04/10/2000
• Re: Return to MDC packet discussion, hal, 04/09/2000
• Re: Two AES ciphers, hal, 04/09/2000
• Re: Two AES ciphers, Jon Callas, 04/09/2000
• Re: Return to MDC packet discussion, Jon Callas, 04/09/2000
• Two AES ciphers, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 04/08/2000
• Re: 5.2.3.16. Key server preferences, L. Sassaman, 04/05/2000
• Re: 5.2.3.16. Key server preferences, hal, 04/05/2000
• Re: 5.2.3.16. Key server preferences, Werner Koch, 04/05/2000
• Re: Return to MDC packet discussion, Werner Koch, 04/05/2000
• Re: 5.2.3.16. Key server preferences, L. Sassaman, 04/05/2000
• Re: 5.2.3.16. Key server preferences, Jon Callas, 04/05/2000
• 5.2.3.16. Key server preferences, L. Sassaman, 04/04/2000
• Re: Return to MDC packet discussion, hal, 04/04/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME interop testing: Very first steps towards a test suite., Ian Bell, 04/03/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME interop testing: Very first steps towards a test suite., Thomas Roessler, 04/01/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME interop testing: Very first steps towards a test suite., Jon Callas, 03/31/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME interop testing: Very first steps towards a test suite., Ian Bell, 03/31/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME interop testing: Very first steps towards a test suite., Thomas Roessler, 03/31/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME interop testing: Very first steps towards a test suite., Jon Callas, 03/30/2000
• PGP/MIME interop, new test data, Thomas Roessler, 03/30/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME interop testing: Very first steps towards a test suite., Thomas Roessler, 03/30/2000
• Re: PGP/MIME interop testing: Very first steps towards a test suite., Ian Bell, 03/30/2000
• Re: Zerucha's OPGP?, Thomas Roessler, 03/29/2000
• Re: Zerucha's OPGP?, Tom Zerucha, 03/29/2000
• PGP/MIME interop testing: Very first steps towards a test suite., Thomas Roessler, 03/29/2000
• Zerucha's OPGP?, Rodney Thayer, 03/29/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Werner Koch, 03/29/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Werner Koch, 03/29/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Thomas Roessler, 03/29/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Thomas Roessler, 03/29/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Thomas Roessler, 03/29/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Dave Del Torto, 03/29/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Werner Koch, 03/29/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Werner Koch, 03/29/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Will Price, 03/28/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Rodney Thayer, 03/28/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Lindsay Mathieson, 03/28/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, hal, 03/28/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Will Price, 03/28/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, John W Noerenberg II, 03/28/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, William H. Geiger III, 03/28/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, Jon Callas, 03/28/2000
• Re: DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, William H. Geiger III, 03/28/2000
• DRAFT status and Compatibility testing, John W Noerenberg II, 03/27/2000
• Fwd: [PGP-Discussion] PGP-Users List is Operational, Robert Guerra, 03/22/2000
• CFP2000 Conference - PGP Keysigning Session, Robert Guerra, 03/18/2000
• Re: OpenPGP-MIME-Draft, Thomas Roessler, 02/18/2000
• Re: OpenPGP-MIME-Draft, wolfgang, 02/17/2000
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-mime-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/15/2000
• Fw: Automated response from IMC Autoresponder <info@xxxxxxx>, caiboyx, 02/14/2000
• Re: Return to MDC packet discussion, Werner Koch, 02/11/2000
• Return to MDC packet discussion, hal, 02/10/2000
• 2nd request: unsubscribe me, Marvin Williams, 02/07/2000
• I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-multsig-00.txt, Internet-Drafts, 02/07/2000
• Re: Fw: Automated response from IMC Autoresponder <info@xxxxxxx>, Dave Del Torto, 02/05/2000
• Fw: Automated response from IMC Autoresponder <info@xxxxxxx>, caiboyx, 02/04/2000
• Fw: Automated response from IMC Autoresponder <info@xxxxxxx>, caiboyx, 02/04/2000
• Re: [Pgp-mime] s/MIME: content-type: multipart/mixed, Lindsay Mathieson, 02/03/2000
• rfc2440bis checklist, Werner Koch, 02/02/2000
• Re: processing of "speculative" key ids: MAY -> SHOULDUST, sen_ml, 01/22/2000
• Re: processing of "speculative" key ids: MAY -> SHOULDUST, Kent Crispin, 01/22/2000
• Re: processing of "speculative" key ids: MAY -> SHOULD|MUST, sen_ml, 01/21/2000
• Re: processing of "speculative" key ids: MAY -> SHOULD UST, wolfgang, 01/21/2000
• Re: processing of "speculative" key ids: MAY -> SHOULDUST, wolfgang, 01/21/2000
• Re: processing of "speculative" key ids: MAY -> SHOULDUST, Werner Koch, 01/21/2000
• Re: processing of "speculative" key ids: MAY -> SHOULDUST, sen_ml, 01/20/2000
• Re: processing of "speculative" key ids: MAY -> SHOULDUST, wolfgang, 01/20/2000
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-00.txt, Ulf M鰈ler, 01/19/2000
• Re: The OpenPGP mailing list has moved, John W. Noerenberg, 01/19/2000
• processing of "speculative" key ids: MAY -> SHOULD|MUST, sen_ml, 01/19/2000
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-openpgp-rfc2440bis-00.txt, Jon Callas, 01/18/2000
• The OpenPGP mailing list has moved, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 01/18/2000
• The OpenPGP mailing list has moved, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 01/18/2000
• Re: Recent spam, Will Price, 01/18/2000
• 你好。, gfy, 01/18/2000
• Re: Recent spam, Paul Koning, 01/18/2000
• Re: Recent spam, wolfgang, 01/18/2000
• 网上冲浪由这里开始!, friend, 01/18/2000
• hi.国内第一家上网付费的公司, money, 01/18/2000
• hi.国内第一家上网付费的公司, money, 01/18/2000
• Re: Recent Spam, Johannes Posel, 01/18/2000
• 不可不看的——21世纪赚钱网络!Cool!, giveumoney, 01/18/2000
• =?gb2312?b?0MLE6rrDo6E=?=, luyj, 01/18/2000
• 爱好者请了, melody, 01/17/2000
• 介绍一个朋友加入您可以获得 12 美元, Anonym, 01/17/2000
• 我向各位道歉，请接受, 捣蛋, 01/17/2000
• =?gb_2312-80?q?=C3=E2=B7=D1=D4=F9=CB=CD400=CD=F2email=B5=D8=D6=B7?==?gb_2312-80?q?=BC=D3=D2=BB=C8=BA=B7=A2=C8=ED=BC=FE?=, xxx, 01/17/2000
• 狂嫌美金，好爽！！！, 您的老朋友, 01/17/2000
• 介绍一个朋友加入您可以获得 50 美元, law, 01/17/2000
• 你好。, gfy, 01/17/2000
• 爱你到永远!?, dream@xxxxxxxxx, 01/17/2000
• Happy New Year, happy, 01/17/2000
• Dancing! Make your life happy!, makeu_h, 01/17/2000
• 你好。, gfy, 01/17/2000
• CnShow娱乐、新闻、信息快报13日刊, cnshow娱乐, 01/16/2000
• 给你100M免费空间再让你赚钱!, ken, 01/16/2000
• 你好。, gfy, 01/16/2000
• 美丽的事物总是在不经意中让我们碰上, ieugnmelw, 01/16/2000
• Who is interested, lw, 01/16/2000
• donghua, aa365, 01/16/2000
• 更正, q890, 01/16/2000
• hi, Power List, 01/16/2000
• 酒店预定热线www.hotelonline.com.cn, allemail@xxxxxxxx, 01/15/2000
• 便到笑呀！ 哈！哈！哈！！！！！(最新货), 二手网站免费发布免费代卖 ( http://PC.CIVIN.COM ) (最新货), 01/15/2000
• PASS MCSE, anonym, 01/15/2000
• 酒店预定热线www.hotelonline.com.cn, allemail@xxxxxxxx, 01/15/2000
• [no subject], yqb, 01/15/2000
• hi, Power List, 01/15/2000
• CnShow娱乐、新闻、信息快报13日刊, cnshow娱乐, 01/15/2000
• 赚钱的工具！！！！, Anonym, 01/15/2000
• [no subject], ken, 01/15/2000
• Re: 3 remarks, Bodo Moeller, 01/14/2000
• [no subject], ken, 01/14/2000
• Money, Money, 01/14/2000
• 介绍一个朋友加入您可以获得 50 美元, Anonym, 01/14/2000
• 生财有道网站向你推荐最好的赚钱完站, 1687, 01/14/2000
• happy, happy, 01/14/2000
• Re: RFC2440 and issuer ID sub-packet, Werner Koch, 01/14/2000
• 牡丹网是洛阳信息港开办的国人第一家网上信息公司，绝对不象外国佬那样欺骗我们，如果他敢欺骗的话，我们一起杀向洛阳。快注册吧！！, An Old Friend, 01/14/2000
• RFC2440 and issuer ID sub-packet, Ian Bell, 01/14/2000
• 每天一部手机等着您 #4B6B, ietf-types, 01/14/2000
• 国内首家赚钱网站, ***, 01/14/2000
• =?gb_2312-80?q?=D0=C2=C4=EA=BA=C3=A3=AC=C5=F3=D3=D1?=, Anonym, 01/14/2000
• [no subject], yeah, 01/14/2000
• =?gb_2312-80?q?=D0=C2=C4=EA=BA=C3=A3=AC=C5=F3=D3=D1?=, Anonym, 01/14/2000
• 牡丹网是洛阳信息港开办的国人第一家网上信息公司，绝对不象外国佬那样欺骗我们，如果他敢欺骗的话，我们一起杀向洛阳。快注册吧！！, An Old Friend, 01/13/2000
• [no subject], lygmh, 01/13/2000
• =?gb2312?b?sru9u834t9E=?=, df948, 01/13/2000
• 不想赚钱请删除, 中国人的赚钱站点, 01/13/2000
• 小说城, goldgook, 01/13/2000
• 上网就开始赚钱了, xcat, 01/13/2000
• 美女写真--最新更新, liuhu, 01/13/2000
• 北京西郊宾馆有限责任公司欢迎您, webmaster, 01/13/2000
• =?gb_2312-80?q?=A1=BE=B2=C2=CD=F8=A1=BF=BB=E1=D4=B1=C5=E4=B9=C9=A3?==?gb_2312-80?q?=AC=D3=D0=BD=B1=BE=BA=B2=C2!?= www.gnet.com.cn, qin, 01/13/2000
• 4752美元的支票, Anonym, 01/13/2000
• 商务发EMAIL交换网赠送10万地址, ss, 01/13/2000
• [no subject], ggg, 01/13/2000
• 牡丹网是洛阳信息港开办的国人第一家网上信息公司，绝对不象外国佬那样欺骗我们，如果他敢欺骗的话，我们一起杀向洛阳。快注册吧！！, An Old Friend, 01/13/2000
• Re: 3 remarks, Ulf M鰈ler, 01/13/2000
• [no subject], yqb, 01/13/2000
• 3 remarks, Werner Koch, 01/13/2000
• 大家好, Anonym, 01/13/2000
• 小孩子不要看, dARK kILLER, 01/12/2000
• [no subject], ken, 01/11/2000
• Re: Line Breaks in OpenPGP ASCII armor, Werner Koch, 01/11/2000
• [no subject], 预算软件, 01/11/2000
• [no subject], yqb, 01/11/2000
• Welcome visit this website, Delfino Solutions, 01/11/2000
• 国内首家付费网诞生啦-----抢到就是钱！！！！！！, anomyous, 01/11/2000
• 欢迎访问 - 中国缘国际交友网站 ！, RCD, 01/11/2000
• 赚人民币,国内首家, Anonym, 01/11/2000
• Line Breaks in OpenPGP ASCII armor, wolfgang, 01/11/2000
• [no subject], 赚钱网站牡丹网正式成立了., 01/10/2000
• Sample mail V2.63, Anonym, 01/10/2000
• 用2元人民币赚1000美元何乐而不为呢？, 一个老朋友, 01/10/2000
• [no subject], yqb, 01/10/2000
• 介绍一个朋友加入您可以获得 50 美元, Anonym, 01/10/2000
• 看了就赚钱, money, 01/10/2000
• 中国人办的第一家网络冲浪付费网站,以前那些网上冲浪付费公司都是海外的没有保障, Jeffery Zoe, 01/10/2000
• 好消息, ***, 01/10/2000
• 2000年情人节(2.14)发布的聊天赚钱站点!!!快抢拉~~~, Anonym, 01/10/2000
• 国内最大的高清晰度色情图片库, sex ! sex ! sex !, 01/09/2000
• 酷死人的赚钱！每小时给你120美元！！你不是在做梦！试一下！！！, Jeffery An, 01/09/2000
• 2000, tanaka, 01/09/2000
• =?gb2312?b?0trMxs341b7T0NK7uPbW2LTzvqrPstKquObL38T6o6E=?=, =?gb2312?b?t/7O8Q==?=, 01/09/2000
• 交友中心欢迎您！！！, owner-ietf-open-pgp, 01/09/2000
• 第四届中国国际电子商务大会简介(Http://ec4.cegn.net), 第四届中国国际电子商务大会组委会, 01/08/2000
• 9, 33213, 01/08/2000
• Free Sex Link already change URL, kasjdfkjwedf, 01/08/2000
• 每小时给你120美元！！！！！, owner-ietf-open-pgp, 01/08/2000
• 每小时给你120美元！！！！！, owner-ietf-open-pgp, 01/08/2000
• [no subject], ken, 01/07/2000
• 网上百老汇全新改版, 001, 01/07/2000
• Welcome visit this website, Delfino Solutions, 01/07/2000

The web site for this mailing list is sponsored by the Internet Mail Consortium. If you have any suggestions for additions or corrections to this Web page, please send them to phoffman@imc.org.