[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ASN.1 packet?

To: ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: ASN.1 packet?
From: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 97 14:13:23 GMT
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx

> From: lutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lutz Donnerhacke)
> Shall we introduce an X.509 frame in packet version 3 and 4?
>   "Content of this packet is a type octet determining the PKCS version,
>    followed by the ASN.1 encoded PKCS octet stream."
>
We should eliminate all references to ASN.1 in the document.  Where
ASN.1 strings are used, they should be documented as binary values,
without mentioning ASN.1.

WSimpson@xxxxxxxxx
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ASN.1 packet?
  - From: Lutz Donnerhacke

Prev by Date: Armor versus MIME versus binary
Next by Date: Re: ASN.1 packet?
Previous by thread: Armor versus MIME versus binary
Next by thread: Re: ASN.1 packet?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread