[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What this WG is doing

To: Rodney Thayer <rodney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: What this WG is doing
From: Ian Grigg <iang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 15:02:30 +0000
Cc: ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
Organization: Systemics
References: <>
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Rodney Thayer wrote:
> 
> >From: lutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lutz Donnerhacke)
> >IMHO: We can't document features or bugs made by a company while we are
> >working on the draft. We can't document bugs as features. Several
> >implementation flaws of PGP 5.x must be cleared in this draft.
> 
> Exactly what flaws of PGP 5.x that manifest themselves as aspects of the
> message format are you referring to?

Anything to do with CMR.  This issue is well documented elsewhere,
elsetime, so I won't repeat it here (let me know if I should summarise).

The main manifestation of this that I know of is the addition of a CMRK
subpacket in the signature packet.

Others may have other feature/bug/flaw sets in mind.

- -- 
iang                                      systemics.com

FP: 1189 4417 F202 5DBD  5DF3 4FCD 3685 FDDE on pgp.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Cryptix 2.21

iQCVAgUANFX+CpUdDk1bRs+FAQG7kgP/dII353mAO3MKcxe9s0YmPV9LgBilCx9B
StSc4ieHEWL9iCMTZGbxllHN6/fSwtw9o4+0bAjZ3Y+/u3J0Ni5JgDJbwcnjLvK9
4W8N+CSP2zZRw/63KaB4OIg8fduj3VC79M0sIkUkRHZjcQ7PT9E8m2X9Txs/Ido4
SjzJhqhjuHQ=
=r4ez
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What this WG is doing
  - From: Adam Back

References:
- Re: What this WG is doing
  - From: Rodney Thayer

Prev by Date: Re: What this WG is doing
Next by Date: Re: key server lookup protocol?
Previous by thread: Re: What this WG is doing
Next by thread: Re: What this WG is doing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread