[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet

To: lutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Lutz Donnerhacke)
Subject: Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet
From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 1997 21:00:38 +0100
Cc: ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: Your message of "04 Nov 1997 18:38:17 GMT." <>
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx

In IETF terms, a 6:9 split is usually called "no consensus".

In a group with > 80 different people posting over the last few
weeks, a "vote" with a turnout of 17 is called a failure.

                            Harald A

References:
- Ballot result: Element vs Packet
  - From: Lutz Donnerhacke

Prev by Date: Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet
Next by Date: Re: What this WG is doing
Previous by thread: Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet
Next by thread: Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread