[no subject]

[nobody@xxxxxxxxxx (Anonymous)]

Darryl Rowe getting with the spirit of Open Standards writes:
>
> IMO, Phil/PGP should simply present the standard to IETF for 
> review, make any modifications, resubmit and so on a couple more 
> times and present a finished product.

Yeah, right on!  They write it, we rubber stamp it without question.
Then they can advertise it as "IETF approved standard".

Sheesh.

Come to think of it why even bother with IETF standards, that would
dispense with inconveniences like having security flaws like CMR
exposed for what they are.

> Though W. Geiger, Jon and a couple others are signalling quite well,

On the topic of CMR?  You're kidding, right?

> others have an enhanced noise level which seems to be subverting any
> progress while others (i.e. RSA) manage to get their PR licks in on
> other fronts. (Wonder if any posters are RSA stooges ...?)

Not that I noticed... but one wonders about PGP stooges... are you a
PGP stooge?

- An OpenPGP list member who is getting increasingly pissed off with
certain "PGP only is allowed to speak" attitudes around here