Ron Craswell wrote: > Please note that none of the authors are RSADSI employees. Accepted. > You may also > note that this new spec has no MUST requirement for any RSADSI > technology. What is the proposal, and how does it cope with the existing user base? -- iang systemics.com FP: 1189 4417 F202 5DBD 5DF3 4FCD 3685 FDDE on pgp.com