[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments)

To: I.Brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments)
From: Adam Back <aba@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 19:52:53 GMT
Cc: ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <> (message from Ian Brown on Wed, 19 Nov 1997 11:04:52 +0000)
Sender: owner-ietf-open-pgp@xxxxxxx

Ian Brown <I.Brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> "Additional request recipients" - as this is still such a controversial
> topic, I don't think it should be included in this first version of the
> standard.

Seconded.

Please let's concentrate on the core functionality without dragging in
controversial "message recovery" features.

> 6.2	- I know the inclusion of ROT-n started as a joke - but it's in
> there! Eeeek! 

I thought Jon was joking about these!  Remove at once please!

Adam

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments)
  - From: Ian Grigg

References:
- Draft comments
  - From: Ian Brown

Prev by Date: Re: The case against redundancy and isolation
Next by Date: Re: The case against redundancy and isolation
Previous by thread: Re: Draft comments
Next by thread: Re: CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread