Re: OpenPGP WG meeting minutes

[Ryan Anderson <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 26 Jan 1998, Ian Brown wrote:

> > The ARR stuff was explicitly designed so that implementations that didn't
> > want to implement it could ignore it safely; it's hard to undo that.
> > Leave it alone for the standard
> 
> That's all I'm asking, and seemed to be the consensus of the group -
> document subpacket 10 as "reserved for future use" with no other
> comment. This did not seem to be what Jon Callas decided at the IETF
> meeting.
> 

Withoutt stating anything, tge critical bit would wreck the signatures on
all keys using this feature.  Something more than "reserved for future
use" needs to be said.  I'd prefer, "  The critical bit may be safely
ignored for this field"..


Ryan anderson
PGP fp: 7E 8E C6 54 96 AC D9 57  E4 F8 AE 9C 10 7E 78 C9
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`