[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comment packets
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <3.0.3.32.19980219120515.00b1e630@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 02/19/98
at 03:05 PM, Jon Callas <jon@xxxxxxx> said:
>RFC1991 says it's never been implemented. If anyone *has* implemented it,
>it will break between OpenPGP and previous versions.
>With Lutz's message, it sounds like he's implemented it. Has anyone else
>implemented it? Does anyone want to argue why it should be there, or pick
>up the argument on eliminating it?
I guess it all depends on what it is being used for. In an earlier reply
to one of my post I was informed that this was not being used so this is
the first I have heard that anyone was using it.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/pgpmr2.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: To whom the gods destroy, they first teach Windows...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNOzNAI9Co1n+aLhhAQF39QP/eXSSbFnzMvffUZy3GcH/fIlnoJRhIjkY
xHgCcXixoShKtaSn8Txq1lwK1HIxTlZUUW1Snlq4/2V1qtiPSLiQLCZUlX23ciRx
eDX52SsS7eIWgPVASkbcOOB5oyJjUbMmqOqeAs2UdzJyKqCenAA5I4DcGlOGIHbh
auV9cdJ/RVw=
=C4dY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----